Showing posts with label Alan Keyes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alan Keyes. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Bill O'Reilly's Version Of Black History Is Predictably Ignorant



Bill O'Reilly's arrogance and ignorance know no bounds.

The right-wing Fox News host was at his head-scratching worst with comments he made during this ridiculous exchange with Charles Krauthammer (a fellow right-winger who was forced to call out the Fox News show host for his stunning ignorance).

This from Crooks and Liars (along with the video):

Krauthammer: It's not a strong field. Not being known now is not dispositive -- nobody had ever heard of Barack Obama at this time in the cycle.

O'Reilly; That's what they always said, but let me challenge you. Barack Obama, a black man. OK, I mean he's half black and half white, but his appearance is black. The first black to ever run, OK? Huge, huge advantage in a campaign. Enormous. The press loved him. LOVED HIM, alright? Promoted him, actively promoted him. NBC News actively promoted his candidacy and so did their parent company General Electric. HUGE advantages Nobody on that list has anything.

Krauthammer: All of that is true, although Jesse Jackson actually was the first who ran.

I could go way back in history and point out all of the black men and women who have run for president, but O'Reilly's ignorance ignores even the last 30 years. Jesse Jackson running in 1984 and 1988 is so obvious it makes O'Reilly look appear ignorant on a scape to epic to believe.

Enough of that, however.

Lets get to another point in O'Reilly's puzzling rant: His implication that Barack Obama was essentially elected president because he was black and he was loved by the media. This is an insult to Barack Obama and implies that Obama is some kind of affirmative action candidate elected president just because he is black.

Even Krauthammer later gave Obama credit for running a good campaign even as O'Reilly tried to portray the president as an affirmative action candidate.

Wikipedia:

In 1888 Frederick Douglass was invited to speak at the Republican National Convention. Afterward during the roll call vote, he received one vote, so was nominally a candidate for the presidency. In those years, the candidates for the presidency and vice-presidency were chosen by state representatives voting at the nominating convention. Many decisions were made by negotiations of state and party leaders "behind closed doors." Douglass was not a serious candidate in contemporary terms.

In 1972, Shirley Chisholm was the first African-American major party candidate for president. She was a candidate for the Democratic Party nomination and participated in the Democratic primaries in numerous states.[1] She campaigned in 12 states and won 28 delegates.[2] In 1984 and 1988, Jesse Jackson was the first major party black candidate to run nationwide primary campaigns. He also ran as a Democratic Party candidate.[3]

In 1992 Alan Keyes was the first African-American candidate to run in the Republican presidential primaries.[citation needed] Keyes ran again, unsuccessfully, in 1996, 2000, and 2008. In 2004, Carol Moseley Braun and Al Sharpton ran as unsuccessful candidates in the Democratic primaries.

O'Reilly's comment was absolutely pathetic.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

CNN’s Roland Martin Calls Out Crazies Over Birth Certificate Nonsense

The stupidity of these nuts on the far right calling attention to President Obama’s birth certificate and whether or not he was born in the United States of America is so nutty.

If you buy into the conspiracy you should close your eyes and think about just how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy of this magnitude (including a Hawaii newspaper which would have had to have had a sort of an amazing clairvoyance to fake this birth announcement knowing Barack Obama was going to become the first black president of the United States almost 50 years down the line).

Birth announcement from the Honolulu Advertiser:

obamalarge

Also, here is the birth certificate of Barack Obama that the birther nuts can’t seem to find and won’t accept:

barack-obama-birth-certificate_472x460

The left, in all honesty, should be thankful for nuts like this who show their extremism in the most idiotic ways to give Americans a contrast.

Here is part of Martin’s column:

The YouTube video of an out-of-control woman yelling and screaming at Republican Congressman Mike Castle’s town hall meeting in Delaware, demanding to see the birth certificate of President Barack Obama, is utterly hilarious.

To watch others cheer her insanity, and then boo the congressman who says the president is an American, shows you that we have a serious problem with mental illness in this country.

The nut jobs that continue to promote this story are wacky, right-wing radio and TV talk shows hosts and no-credibility bloggers. They have latched onto this story like bloodsucking leeches, and actually want us to believe this story has legs.

Last week, in a suit filed by perennial presidential loser, Alan Keyes, they even tried to claim a court victory after a federal district judge in California asked to listen to the merits of their case. I’m sure he simply wanted to see for himself how delusional they are.

CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/22/martin.obama.birth/index.html

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Foolish Right-Wing Nuts Still Sounding Crazy About Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate


The nuts on the far right of the political spectrum are beginning to look increasingly unstable as they manufacture conspiracy theories about President Obama’s place of birth and whether or not he really is a citizen of the United States of American (one of the necessary requirements to become president). These nuts, led by bitter Alan Keyes who has been whipped politically by Obama, continue to advance useless speculation and waste time and resources pursuing ghosts.

Here is the transcript from Lou Dobbs’ CNN show guest-hosted by Kitty Pilgrim. Even as Pilgrim confronts the two player-hater guests with a mountain of evidence and facts, they still are unsatisfied.

Frankly, I thought Keyes was nuts, but that lawyer (Orly Taitz) makes him look composed, rational and credible.

Here is the transcript from Media Matters for America:

PILGRIM: Well, an Army Reserve major is again raising controversy over President Obama’s place of birth. Now, the major challenged his deployment orders, claiming that President Obama wasn’t born in the United States, and that renders his orders illegal.

Now, a former presidential candidate, Alan Keyes, also filed a lawsuit challenging the president’s right to hold an office, and a hearing will be — on that suit will be held on Monday.

Now, questions about the president’s place of birth have been asked and answered many times since before the election, and the president’s birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii. The state’s Republican governor and other officials have backed that up. CNN has fully investigated the issue, found no basis for the questions about the president’s birthplace, but the controversy lives on, especially on the Internet.

Joining me now is Orly Taitz, and she represents the Army major and filed the Keyes lawsuit. Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes joins us. And on the other side, John Avlon, who is a columnist for the DailyBeast.com and author of Independent Nation; and Errol Louis, columnist for the New York Daily News and a CNN contributor, also an attorney.

And so, let me, just before we start, bear with me a bit. There’s overwhelming evidence that proves that his birth certificate is real, and that he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961. If you’ll just bear with me, I’ll run through a little bit of the evidence, and then we can get to this discussion. Now, the Annenberg Political Fact Check, which is a nonpartisan group, went to Chicago to view the birth certificate last year, and they released photos and this statement, “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he always has said.”

The Republican governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, on record, she says Obama was indeed born in her state, and we should note, she did support John McCain. So, we also have a copy of the Honolulu Advertiser, the newspaper, August 13, and the Hawaii Star-Bulletin, August 14, 1961, both announcing Barack Obama’s birth.

Also, October last year, the director of the Hawaii Department of Health wrote a letter, stating, “I have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedure.”

PolitiFact.com reissued their results from their investigation they conducted in June of last year, and they say, quote, “Since we published Obama’s birth certificate, questions about its authenticity have been frequent and fierce. After reviewing the evidence, we are confident of our rulings.”

And this is the last one; thanks for bearing with me. The White House press briefing this week, reporter from the WorldNetDaily pressed again about the birth certificate. The White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said this following comment:

GIBBS (video clip): Do all of your listeners and the listeners throughout this country the service to which any journalist owes those listeners, and that is the pursuit of the noble truth, and the noble truth is that the president was born in Hawaii, a state of the United States of America.

PILGRIM: Now, Alan Keyes, you’ve been patient letting me get through all that, but what more do you need to be convinced?

KEYES: Some evidence. And the evidence is something that President Obama is strenuously blocking. You ask me to prove that I was born in New York City at the time and hospital I say, and I will give you a certified copy of a full birth certificate with a doctor’s signature, the hospital, and everything else. I won’t direct you to some photograph on the Internet and a bunch of hearsay statements that would not be accepted as evidence in any court of law.

And so the very simple question is: Why spend $800,000 to a million dollars blocking the birth certificate, blocking records at school and college that would in any way have a bearing on the question –

PILGRIM: All right, Alan –

KEYES: — both of his birth and of his citizenship claims at various times in his life.

PILGRIM: Let me let –

KEYES: Why is he going to all this trouble if, as they say, the matter is resolved? Can’t be resolved by a bunch of statements and assertions.

PILGRIM: OK, Orly, we have to keep this quicker –

TAITZ: Yes.

PILGRIM: — but please tell me what you –

TAITZ: OK, Obama never provided his birth certificate. What he provided is certification of live birth that was issued last year that does not have the name of the doctor, does not have the name of the hospital, does not have any signatures. Do you know that Hawaii has a statute, 338, that allows foreign-born children of Hawaiian residence to get Hawaiian birth certificates? Did you know that?

PILGRIM: Errol, I would like you to respond.

LOUIS: Listen, I think — I think what we have here is a case where under the guise of saying, well, we can’t trust whether or not he should be president because we don’t have the evidence, it’s actually the reverse. These are folks — and there are a number of them, and some of them are raising money, like WorldNetDaily, which is as far as I’m concerned, running a scam, where they’re selling all kinds of bumper stickers and stuff like that. And I don’t know what Miss Taitz is taking in the way of legal fees.

TAITZ: Excuse me, if you –

LOUIS: They’re raising legal fees from across the country –

TAITZ: I’m doing this pro bono.

PILGRIM: All right.

LOUIS: — and the reality is they don’t accept –

TAITZ: It’s pro bono.

LOUIS: — they don’t accept that the president is the president –

TAITZ: No, no, no, no.

LOUIS: — and, therefore, they work backward and there will never be enough proof to satisfy them.

PILGRIM: All right, John, I have to let –

AVLON: You’ve offered a mountain of evidence in addition to two birth announcements. That’s a pretty deep conspiracy. What we have here –

TAITZ: Can I respond to this?

AVLON: No.

PILGRIM: In just one second.

AVLON: What we have here is Obama derangement syndrome. This is pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism.

TAITZ: This is nonsense. This is total nonsense. You have never investigated this.

AVLON: Ambassador Keyes says that President Obama has called him a radical communist.

TAITZ: This is absolutely irrelevant. Sir, this is absolutely irrelevant.

AVLON: You on your blog have repeatedly referred to the administration as Gestapo SS. Which is it? Get your story straight. Is he a Nazi or a communist? You guys are nuts.

TAITZ: You don’t know what you’re talking about.

PILGRIM: Orly, I have to ask you to let everyone at least have their say before you respond to it.

TAITZ: OK.

PILGRIM: I believe we’re out of time, I’m sorry to say. Great discussion. Orly Taitz, Alan Keyes, Errol Louis, and John Avlon.

TAITZ: You know what, let me just mention one more thing. In order to be the president, you have to have two parents that are citizens. Obama’s father was never a citizen of this country.

PILGRIM: All right.

TAITZ: He was a British citizen.

PILGRIM: Orly, we have to call it there. I’m sorry. Thank you very much — all of you — for joining in this very lively debate.

Another attack on Barack Obama that I doubt few (if any) other people who served as president of the United States of America ever had to deal with.

It makes me wonder why.

Monday, May 18, 2009

One Too Many Ass Whippings For Alan Keyes

Alan Keyes, the crazed right winger who has an ongoing vendetta against President Barack Obama, has lost his mind. The latest evidence that Keyes is more nutty than Planters, came with his obsessive activities at the University of Notre Dame before, during and since commencement activities.

KEYES: Well, I think it was clearly an effort today to try to establish some kind of moral legitimacy for Obama despite the fact that he takes an extremist stance on child-killing that marks him as the focal point evil, with respect to this heinous destruction of innocent life in our world today.

That quote is evidence that Keyes (who has made a career out of hateful language and political defeat) is a nut who is off his rocker. His vicious and hateful words have done little more than drag the Republican party down into the mud of extremism and bitterness.

Crooks and Liars:
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/alan-keyes-calls-president-obama-cen

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Ken Blackwell Is Almost As Much Of A Nut As Alan Keyes

Why on Earth do conservative Republicans insist on continuing with this rhetoric of division and intolerance? Conservatives have taken a simple commencement address by President Barack Obama and now are working to use it as a cheap political weapon against him and to push their ultra-conservative views on abortion into the national spotlight.

Here is an excerpt from a Fox News column written by Ken Blackwell. Read some of the extremist rhetoric he is using about a president who has been in office a little over three months:

By Ken Blackwell
Fellow, Family Research Council/Former Vice President, Xavier University

Many are questioning why officials at the University of Notre Dame are inviting the most pro-abortion president in our history to receive an honorary doctorate of laws. Doesn’t this make a mockery of Notre Dame’s historic role as the premier Catholic university in America? Doesn’t this create a scandalfor the Catholic faithful as well as for the larger community of Americans who are not Catholic? Much of the fierce public debate has centered on why Notre Dame would extend such an honor. The divisions exposed by this invitation are deep and worrisome.

The divisions are created by men like Ken Blackwell who want to turn a commencement ceremony into a debate on abortion rights. The Ken Blackwells of the world are exploiting President Obama’s visit to the University of Notre Dame as a way of pushing their anti-abortion agenda. President Obama is there for the students of the University of Notre Dame and (at least to my knowledge), is not there to speak on the issue of abortion. Opportunists like Blackwell and Alan Keyes want to use this appearance by President Obama to try and jam a little deeper the wedge into the gap that exists between those who favor abortion rights and those who are opposed to abortion rights.

More from Blackwell:

I see another reason why President Obama is going to Notre Dame. He knows the truth of the maxim: divide and conquer. He has already succeeded in dividing the Evangelical community in America.Although most Evangelical Protestants, both black and white, are pro-life and pro-marriage, President Obama has been able to convince millions that he wants to limit abortions and uphold marriage as the union of one man and one woman. He has accomplished this feat while vigorously promoting pro-abortion and anti-marriage policies and personnel.

Talk about the politics of division. Ken Blackwell’s own words, throughout this column, are a clinic on the politics of division and intolerance.

Fox News:
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/05/14/blackwell_obama_notre_dame/