Thursday, July 30, 2009

Officer Apologizes For Racial Slur Against Henry Louis Gates Jr.

It seems Boston Police Department Officer Justin Barrett has come out and issued an apology for a nasty e-mail in which he calls Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. a “banana-eating jungle monkey.” Yeah, apparently he did in fact write that message. You can see Barrett’s apology below. Now, who knows what the record of Barrett is with regard to such poor conduct (if, in fact, he does have a prior history). His record may be squeaky clean (outside of this substantial stain). I don’t know that Barrett should necessarily be fired, but if he is not relieved of his duties … his margin for error should be pretty small.

Here is an excerpt from a story published online by CNN:

A Boston police officer who sent a mass e-mail referring to Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. as a “banana-eating jungle monkey” has apologized, saying he’s not a racist.

Officer Justin Barrett told a Boston television station on Wednesday night that he was sorry for the e-mail.

“I regret that I used such words,” Barrett told CNN affiliate WCVB-TV. “I have so many friends of every type of culture and race you can name. I am not a racist.”

Barrett was placed on administrative leave after the e-mail surfaced, and he might lose his job as a result.

In a news conference held Thursday morning, Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis denounced the e-mail.

“We have a relationship to maintain with the community,” he said. “Police officers certainly have First Amendment rights, but they can’t cross the line. I believe this crosses the line.”

Remember all of that talk about us being post-racial … I guess we’re not there yet and maybe not even close as we’ve seen with some of the far-right anger directed at our nation’s first black president.

CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/07/30/gates.police.apology/index.html

It’s Probably Good The Far-Right Nuts Will Not Be At The Crowley, Gates, Obama Beer Summit

The far right wing has been angry since President Obama invited Sgt. James Crowley and Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. to the White House to talk about things in the wake of the controversial arrest that stirred racial tensions nationwide.

Naturally, the conservative nuts do not think Crowley should attend until President Obama submits to their will and offershis best Kunta Kinte impersonation (apologize profusely and say exactly what they want him to say … loud enough so that everyone else can hear it … to be made an example of). The conservatives, even some black ones, are saying they would not go to the meeting if they were in Sgt. Crowley’s shoes.

But, I suppose that probably makes some sense asI doubt the White House was going to be serving much Hater-ade (which would disappoint career haters such as the ones in this Media Matters for America video).

Media Matters:
http://mediamatters.org/research/200907300024

A Vicious Slur Used By Cop Against Henry Louis Gates


A nasty slur was used against Henry Louis Gates Jr., the black Harvard University professor, who was involved in an unfortunate incident that led to his ridiculously being arrested. Now, it appears a Boston Police Department officer named Justin Barrett, in an e-mail, has used a racial slur to describe Prof. Gates as a “jungle monkey.”

Here is a statement reported by the Boston Globe which quoted police spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll:

“Yesterday afternoon, Commissioner Davis was made aware that Officer Barrett was the author of correspondence which included racially charged language,” she said. “At that time, Commissioner Davis immediately stripped Officer Barrett of his gun and badge, and at this time we will be moving forward with the hearing process.”

CNN’s Dwindling Credibility, Lou Dobbs Joined At The Hip

Lou Dobbs is an anchor holding (if not dragging) down CNN’s lofty status as the most trusted name in news.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Glenn Beck Proves Again To Be Nothing Short Of An Idiot

The depth and breadth of Glenn Beck’s stupidity is virtually beyond human comprehension. The crazed Fox News host, who has proven he has no business with a platform on any legitimate news network, recently said this: “The president has exposed himself, I think, as a guy, over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or white culture.” Beck, like a lot of the far-right conservatives, is working overtime to attack President Obama using racial politics as a result of the controversy surrounding the ridiculous arrest of Prof. Henry Louis Gates for, as Bill Maher described it, the crime of not kissing an officer’s butt.

From Think Progress:

Yesterday on Fox News, host Glenn Beck went on a rant about President Obama’s comments about the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and the upcoming meeting Obama will have with Gates, who is African-American, and the arresting officer, Jim Crowley. “This president has exposed himself, I think, as a guy, over and over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people, or white culture,” Beck complained, later adding, “He has a, this guy is, I believe, a racist.”

The NAACP came out with a statement chastising Beck for his comments. “We commend President Obama for having the courage to discuss an issue that all too many Americans consider a third rail,” the statement said.

Like the NAACP, I also commend President Obama not only for speaking out on the issue, but of standing up for a friend of his. He could have phrased his original comment better, but I think the sentiment was right on the money.

Also, as cited by Think Progress:

This morning, the crew on MSNBC’s Morning Joe ripped Beck for an entire segment of the show:

WASHINGTON POST’S JONATHAN CAPEHART: How is it possible that this guy can sit on national television and call this guy a racist? The President is half white!

MSNBC HOST MIKE BARNICLE: In reality, Glenn Beck is just show business. …The larger, dumber statement is that the President of the United States has a deep seeded hatred for white people. Hello Glenn!? His mother was white! He was raised by a white woman, his grandmother! Hello!? Glenn? … Come back down to Earth please!

HOST MIKA BRZEZINSKI: Outrageous is one way of putting it. I would say irresponsible, especially now…selfish, self-indulging.

Beck is disgraceful, but maybe it goes to show if you’re partially black to some people you’re all black. I honestly think there are times people forget that President Obama is half white.

If the man had any mind to begin with then he clearly has lost it.

Maybe it’s that whole one-drop thing.

From Wikipedia:

The one-drop rule is a historical colloquial term in the United States that holds that a person with any trace of African ancestry is considered black (unless they have an alternative non-white ancestry, such as Native American, Asian, Arab, Polynesian or Australian aboriginal).[1] It developed most strongly out of the binary culture of long years of institutionalized slavery.

This notion of invisible/intangible membership in a racial group has seldom been applied to people of other ancestry (see Race in the United States for details). The concept has been chiefly applied to those of black African ancestry. As Langston Hughes wrote, “You see, unfortunately, I am not black. There are lots of different kinds of blood in our family. But here in the United States, the word ‘Negro’ is used to mean anyone who has any Negro blood at all in his veins. In Africa, the word is more pure. It means all Negro, therefore black. I am brown.”[2]

Enablers Of Racism Are Almost As Bad As Flat-Out Racists

It never ceases to amaze me how far people will go to protect cops who make mistakes, engage in racial profiling or commit acts of police brutality. Generally speaking, one of the first excuses you hear is almost precisely what was written by a man name Steve Crowder, who typed up a blog for the right-wing site Big Hollywood. You see, to many of our fellow citizens to the right of the political and cultural mainstream, when minorities are arrested or get in any confrontation with the police, the officer’s statement is always taken as the undeniable truth, as irrefutable fact. To many of these individuals, when blacks are arrested, racially profiled, harassed or become victims of police brutality … they earned it and it would not have happened unless they did something wrong. These enablers of racism, racial profiling, police brutality and/or more are about as dangerous as those who actually commit these kinds of acts.

Wrote Crowder:

I hate to say this, but it must be noted to understand the situation at hand: Black people commit more violent crime per capita than any other race. Now before you go all Johnny Cochran on me here and declare me a racist, let me just state that I am simply addressing a statistic, much like President Obama did last Wednesday. The only difference is that my statistic doesn’t fit into a politically correct agenda with an end game designed to demonize the members of our law enforcement. Do you folks out there honestly assume the worst in all cops? Does it insult you that Barack Obama assumes you do?

Lets dissect. He starts with one of the oldest racist talking points in the book: blacks commit more crimes than other races. I didn’t see any statistics about the number of blacks living at or below the poverty level. Might that have an impact on crime? There certainly is nothing original in that part as he jumps right off the bat and sticks it right in the face of his readers. Then, after misspelling the late Johnnie Cochran’s name, he takes his customary right-wing cheap shot at President Obama as he begins to lay out a plan of attack against the president to try and scare whites using race as a weapon.

Near the end of that excerpt, he goes hysterical by asking “do you folks out there honestly assume the worst in all cops?” This is just plain ignorant and takes an Olympic championship-like leap to go from President Obama’s statement about one cop involved in one case to that ridiculous statement. Then he asks, “Does it insult you that Barack Obama assumes you do?” President Obama was speaking for himself ( and from what I heard he was not speaking for anyone else) and giving his personal opinion of a situation that involved a friend (something he prefaced his comments with), Henry Louis Gates, Jr. So, I am not sure what Crowder is getting at with such a statement.

This is what Crowder follows that up with:

“There is a long history of African-Americans and Latino’s being stopped by law enforcement, disproportionately” – Barack Hussein Obama. Boy, there’s a prejudiced little statement… against cops.

Sure it may be true that more minorities in this country are pulled over or even given the once-over by our police officers… But a disproportionate amount… Really?

When you take into account that black people are over seven times more likely to commit murder or a violent crime, I think you’ve got to ask yourself, at what point do we forbid a police officer from doing his job in the name of political correctness? Shouldn’t the honorable men and women who put themselves in harms way to protect us be given the benefit of the doubt?

After laying out statistics he says asserts blacks commit more crimes than other races, he pretty much slams President Obama for being “prejudiced” for citing a history of blacks and Latinos being stopped more often by police. Crowderseems to be hypocritical.

Then, of course, he tries to reinforce his primary message by again citing facts he likely feels portray blacks as more violent.

Here, however, is where Crowderreally seems to go irrational:

Another question… How can so many cops be “racist white men” when many of the police officers themselves are minorities (much like Crowley’s black partner who was at the scene and supports the man 100%)?

He does not seem to establish who says so many cops are “racist white men” in his blog. Just because his black partner backed him up is irrelevant and hardly a surprise. Cops who racially profile are not all white. Also, think about it: What’s the first defense when someone is accused of racism (and I am not personally accusing Sgt. Crowley of that, but I am accusing him of being a bit of an arrogant cop who probably wanted Gates to essentially kiss his butt): “I have black friends” or “I have a black partner” or something along those lines.

No one is accusing all cops of anything. To make such an assertion is ignorant and alarmist.

This is one case, and not a statement of fact against all police officers.

The main reason I wrote this blog was to show the extent to which enablers of racism will go to make their point even if it means using the politics of fear to smear an entire race as violent.

Fear Of A Black President

See how racism has gripped the far-right movement polluted by bigots like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, G. Gordon Liddy and others.

Rep. Thaddeus McCotter Is A Disgrace To The State Of Michigan

Right-wing nuts, led by Fox News (the far right’s biased media megaphone), have been fighting to keep the issue race issue involving the arrest of Prof. Henry Louis Gates Jr. in the public eye to try and score political points with white voters. Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, taking a break from solving some very real problems that plague those of us who live in the great (although economically-troubled) state of Michigan, is drafting a useless resolution to try and make the president of the United States of America apologize to McCotter’s satisfaction. It’s a waste of time and it goes to show how right wingers are attempting to use this as a political tool. These right wingers don’t give a damn about Sgt. James Crowley (he’s just a pawn they’re using to attack President Obama), the very real problem of racial profiling or Prof. Henry Louis Gates Jr.

Here is text of McCotter’s dumb resolution (that is an irresponsible waste of time involving, primarily, three people):

Whereas on July 16, 2009, Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley responded to a 911 call from a neighbor of Harvard University Professor Henry Louis (”Skip”) Gates, Jr. about a suspected break-in in progress at his residence, which had been broken into on a prior occasion;

Whereas on July 22, 2009, in responding to a question during a White House press conference President Barack Obama stated: “Skip Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased here. I don’t know all of the facts involved in this local police response incident”;

Whereas President Obama proceeded to state Sergeant Crowley “acted stupidly” for arresting Professor Gates on charges of disorderly conduct;

Whereas, as a former Constitutional Law Professor, President Obama well understands that all Americans are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and their actions should not be prejudged prior to being fully and fairly judged by an appropriate and objective authority after due process;

Whereas, President Obama’s nationally televised remarks may likely detrimentally influence the full and fair judgment by an appropriate and objective authority after due process regarding this local police response incident and, thereby, impair Sergeant Crowley’s legal and professional standing in relation to said incident; and

Whereas, President Obama appeared at a daily White House Press briefing on July 24, 2009 to address his denouncement of Sergeant Crowley and stated: “I could have calibrated those words differently” but “I continue to believe, based on what I have heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Professor Gates out of his home to the station.”

Whereas, President Obama’s refusal to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Sergeant Crowley and, instead, reiterate his accusation impugning Sergeant Crowley’s professional conduct in the performance of his duties;

Now therefore be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives–

Calls upon President Obama to retract his initial public remarks and apologize to Cambridge, Massachusetts Police Sergeant James M. Crowley for having unfairly impugned and prejudged his professional conduct in this local police response incident.

This guy has disgraced the state of Michigan and sought to exploit the unfortunate incident between Henry Louis Gates and Sgt. James Crowley to take a political shot at President Obama.

This guy is symbolic of opportunistic Republicans eager to keep this issue alive to try and portray President Obama as some black, anti-police radical.

McCotter, and those like him, are enablers of racial profiling. They take everything the police say at face value and virtually ignore anything that comes from the other side of an arrest or conflict with the police.

Now, consider this idiotic statement from Jameson Cunningham, minister of propagandapress secretary for McCotter:

“He has said he will introduce the legislation if the President does not retract and apologize for his comments,”said Jameson Cunningham, press secretary for McCotter, when asked if Obama had already addressed his concerns. “As of now, no apology has been issued.”

That sounds like a threat to me.

This Republican is trying to show President Obama his place, and it has a familiar feel to it.

Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/27/gop-rep-will-offer-resolu_n_245287.html

Think Progress:
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/27/mccotter-resolution/

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Cutting Back On Blogging

I am cutting back on my blogging for now (it may or may not be temporary). I just have some things I need to think about and take care of.

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Lou Dobbs To CNN: Who’s Your Daddy?

This whole birther flap between conservative mouthpiece Lou Dobbs and his CNN superiors is beginning to reflect an episode of the Maury Povich Show. Lou Dobbs would be sitting in one chair, CNN President Jon Klein is sitting in another chair and Maury is in a third.

The script is all too familiar:

“When it comes to who is in charge at CNN … JON KLEIN … YOU ARE NOT THE FATHER.”

Media Matters for America:
http://mediamatters.org/press/releases/200907240039

I’m going to go out on a limb and question whether Lou Dobbs’ dance skills are up to par, but he is the daddy at CNN.

Friday, July 24, 2009

Do I Feel Lucky ...

Rep. Gwen Moore has some strong words for those fighting health care reform.

Same Old Story: Fox News Provides Platform To Rush Limbaugh Who Makes Race-Based Attack On President Obama

Republican leader Rush Limbaugh was interviewed by Greta Van Susteren of Fox News (the network conservatives trust) and, of course, the subject of President Obama came up. Naturally, Limbaugh used this platform to launch another race-based attack on the president. A major part of the reason that Limbaugh attacks the president, using race, is because it pleases his party and strengthens his position in the Republican Party and on the far right of the political spectrum. Limbaugh can say what a lot of people want to say about our first black president, but don’t have the guts to say it. This is why they defend Rush and fear crossing him to the point we’ve seen apology after apology from those who offend Limbaugh.

LIMBAUGH: I think Obama is largely misunderstood by a lot of people. … We’re finding out that this guy’s got a chip on his shoulder. He’s angry at this country. He’s not proud of it. […]

Let’s face it, President Obama’s black, and I think he’s got a chip on his shoulder. I think there are elements in this country he doesn’t like and he never has liked. And he’s using the power of the presidency to remake the country.

Take note of all of the racist stereotypes of black people: angry, chip on his shoulders, angry at his country, not proud of it …

These are all historical racist stereotypes of black people.

Think Progress:
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/24/limbaughs-obama-is-black/

CNN’s One-Sided Commentary In Gates-Police Flap Misses A Few Points

Point out racial profiling is not about bashing police officers. In the wake of the unfortunate incident that left Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates ridiculously arrested, some have used it as a way to bash the police while others have used it as a way to portray police as being unfairly persecuted while minimizing the very painful impact of racial profiling.

This article published by CNN makes some fair points (it appears to be a probably well-intended defense of the police while attempting to be somewhat fair to professor Gates), and certainly is a defense of police and the work that police do, but misses the mark on some key points (perhaps for partisan political reasons):

  • President Obama confessed his bias when he admitted that he was a friend of Gates as the question was asked at the press conference;
  • President Obama admitted that he had not gotten all of the facts, but did offer his opinion on what he had learned about what happened to his friend;
  • As a follow-up, President Obama said that he wished cooler heads had prevailed; and
  • Racial profiling is not touched on in the article until the very last paragraph and is there kind of glossed over.

I’m not here to bash policeman, but I do agree with the president that (in this particular case) cooler heads should have prevailed and the officer should have appreciated the situation (and how it was perceived by Gates who was in his own home) and walked away after he established that Gates was rightfully in his house and safe.

Actually, this cop sounds like a decent guy. Gates sounds like a decent guy. Decent guys make mistakes, but it’s unfortunate it has ended up the way it has.

This was an overreaction by the police officer which prompted an overreaction by the professor. In a way, this officer may have made the situation more dangerous and high profile by his conduct.

The title of the article is “Obama’s rush to judgment

Thursday, July 23, 2009

President Obama Speaks Out Strongly Against Ridiculous Arrest Of Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.

The ridiculous arrest of Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. is getting national headlines. At his Wednesday evening news conference, President Obama spoke out in strong terms as he condemned the arrest and discussed the issue of racial profiling that remains far too prevalent in our society. It was nice to see President Obama speak out so strongly even though he probably runs the risk of upsetting some who tend to side with the police (almost unconditionally) in cases of allegations of brutality or racial profiling.

Here is an excerpt of President Obama’s response to the question on Professor Gates, who is one of the top scholars in America:

Question: Thank you, Mr. President. Recently, Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., was arrested at his home in Cambridge. What does that incident say to you and what does it say about race relations in America?

Obama: Well, I should say at the outset that Skip Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased here. I don’t know all the facts.

What’s been reported though is that the guy forgot his keys, jimmied his way to get into the house. There was a report called in to the police station that there might be a burglary taking place. So far, so good, right? I mean, if I was trying to jigger into — well, I guess this is my house now, so…

(Laughter)

… it probably wouldn’t happen. But let’s say my old house in Chicago.

(Laughter)

Here, I’d get shot.

(Laughter)

But so far, so good. They’re — they’re reporting. The police are doing what they should. There’s a call. They go investigate what happens.

My understanding is, at that point, Professor Gates is already in his house. The police officer comes in. I’m sure there’s some exchange of words. But my understanding is, is that Professor Gates then shows his ID to show that this is his house and, at that point, he gets arrested for disorderly conduct, charges which are later dropped.

Now, I don’t know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it’s fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home; and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there’s a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That’s just a fact.

As you know, Lynn, when I was in the state legislature in Illinois, we worked on a racial profiling bill because there was indisputable evidence that blacks and Hispanics were being stopped disproportionately. And that is a sign, an example of how, you know, race remains a factor in the society.

That doesn’t lessen the incredible progress that has been made. I am standing here as testimony to the progress that’s been made. And yet the fact of the matter is, is that, you know, this still haunts us.

And even when there are honest misunderstandings, the fact that blacks and Hispanics are picked up more frequently and often time for no cause casts suspicion even when there is good cause.

And that’s why I think the more that we’re working with local law enforcement to improve policing techniques so that we’re eliminating potential bias, the safer everybody is going to be.

CNN’s Roland Martin Calls Out Crazies Over Birth Certificate Nonsense

The stupidity of these nuts on the far right calling attention to President Obama’s birth certificate and whether or not he was born in the United States of America is so nutty.

If you buy into the conspiracy you should close your eyes and think about just how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy of this magnitude (including a Hawaii newspaper which would have had to have had a sort of an amazing clairvoyance to fake this birth announcement knowing Barack Obama was going to become the first black president of the United States almost 50 years down the line).

Birth announcement from the Honolulu Advertiser:

obamalarge

Also, here is the birth certificate of Barack Obama that the birther nuts can’t seem to find and won’t accept:

barack-obama-birth-certificate_472x460

The left, in all honesty, should be thankful for nuts like this who show their extremism in the most idiotic ways to give Americans a contrast.

Here is part of Martin’s column:

The YouTube video of an out-of-control woman yelling and screaming at Republican Congressman Mike Castle’s town hall meeting in Delaware, demanding to see the birth certificate of President Barack Obama, is utterly hilarious.

To watch others cheer her insanity, and then boo the congressman who says the president is an American, shows you that we have a serious problem with mental illness in this country.

The nut jobs that continue to promote this story are wacky, right-wing radio and TV talk shows hosts and no-credibility bloggers. They have latched onto this story like bloodsucking leeches, and actually want us to believe this story has legs.

Last week, in a suit filed by perennial presidential loser, Alan Keyes, they even tried to claim a court victory after a federal district judge in California asked to listen to the merits of their case. I’m sure he simply wanted to see for himself how delusional they are.

CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/22/martin.obama.birth/index.html

Low-Class Fox News Provides Platform To Weight Bigot Who Bashes Surgeon General Nominee

Fox News host Neil Cavuto provided a platform to a man named Michael Karolchyk who was wearing a T-shirt that read “NO CHUBBIES” across the chest. The shirt and the segment were part of a discussion hosted by Cavuto about whether or not President Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Dr. Regina Benjamin, is too fat to serve as the surgeon general. I wonder how many male surgeon general nominees or surgeon generals ever have had their weight question as a qualifying factor? What kind of a low-class guy comes onto a national television broadcast and wears a shirt like that (in this context)? Imagine if Karolchyk was put on the air to discuss race relations wearing a shirt that read “NO DARKIES” across the chest.benjamin_regina_080922_mn

This guy is a moron and Fox News should be ashamed of itself for hosting this clown (especially with that shirt on)? I say that in spite of the fact Cavuto did somewhat challenge the guy for some of his stupid comments.

To open the segment, as documented by Huffington Post:

Brilliant, dedicated, experienced and, oh yeah, fat. The President’s pick for Surgeon General is fat. Not a lot fat, but enough fat for my next guest to say fat chance for Dr. Regina Benjamin to even be considered. (emphasis mine)

Here is what the sweetheart of a guy, Karolchyk said:

Dr. Benjamin is 50 pounds overweight. She is obese. She’s a size 20. [...]

Ok, let’s then turn the tables. Would you then want the head of the Fed Reserve to be a guy in a cardboard box who lives underneath the highway because because he understands the plight of poor people and he understands how to make money work? [...] Would you want Michael Jackson’s doctors to be in charge of drug control at the DEA? The bottom line is it’s a symbolic position and obesity is the number one issue facing our country in terms of the health and wellness and she has shown not that she was born this way, not that she woke up one day and was obese, she has show through being lazy, and making poor food choices, that she’s obese.

This is so dumb, ignorant and bigoted it’s almost incomprehensible.

Talking Points Memo is reporting other media outlets are calling into question Dr. Benjamin’s appropriateness as surgeon general due to her weight (which apparently is more offensive than previous male surgeon generals.

Karolchyk’s logic is flawed on so many levels it’s sad. For Fox News to provide a forum for this man to spew his bigotry and attack a person with what seems to be impeccable credentials is pitiful.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Rick Sanchez Calls Out Moronic Birthers On CNN

The nut cases are out and making baseless and idiotic charges about President Barack Obama not being born in the United States of America in spite of overwhelming evidence.

These people are morons.

This has a smell of racism.

Harry Alford On Bill O’Reilly’s Show

Harry Alford was on Bill O’Reilly’s right-wing Fox News show to discuss his heated and highly-publicized confrontation with Sen. Barbara Boxer during a committee meeting. Obviously, when race is a factor it grabs the attention of a lot of people (it’s even more interesting when you have a black conservative and a white liberal). I still question Boxer’s motives and wonder why she brought race into the issue the way she did (and why she did not have others there to testify rather than read their opinions from paper). But, we’ve been down that road. The more I listen to Alford the more I hear his inner right winger beginning to come out. I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with it, but Alford runs the risk of overplaying his hand by trying to portray Boxer as something she clearly isn’t. Boxer may be a partisan, and she may be arrogant as hell, but she is no racist.

Chris Matthews Smokes Birther Nut


Fox Nation Should Take Down Homophobic Comment About Barney Frank

Here is a disgraceful comment left by a poster at Fox Nation. Hopefully the right wingers who run this blog will take it down. The story is about ESPN’s Erin Andrews being victimized by a person who filmed her naked or with very little clothing on. The story had nothing to do with Rep. Barney Frank, but here comes a close-minded conservative launching an attack based on hatred.

A poster named “Out of the Blue” writes: Just cover the “Peep Hole” when you get to your room. Especially if you are in the same hotel with Barney Frank, then cover all holes guys.

HOMOPHOBIC FOX NATION

Tyler Perry Does The Right Thing

How traumatic must it have been for those kids to, in essence, be booted from that suburban Philadelphia swimming pool due to racism? Thankfully, one of the biggest names in show business is stepping forward to do something nice for those kids who had to experience the ugly side of the human experience. Tyler Perry is going to do something that will help those kids say, “I’M GOING TO DISNEY WORLD!”

PHILADELPHIA — Tyler Perry is paying for 65 children from a Philadelphia day camp to go to Walt Disney World after reading about allegations that a suburban swim club had shunned them because of racism.

The black and Hispanic children who attend the day camp run by Creative Steps Inc. cheered Monday when they learned about the actor’s gift.

Creative Steps director Alethea Wright says she’s thrilled about the offer, especially because Perry “comes from humble beginnings” like the children in her camp.

That’s great news. We’ve seen enough of the ugly side of the human spirit and it warms the heart to see the more pleasant side of the human spirit.

Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/tyler-perry-treats-65-swi_n_241750.html

Washington Post Gets Comment From Henry Louis Gates Jr. About Arrest

The Washington Post gained what it has labeled an exclusive interview, Tuesday morning, with Harvard University professor Henry Louis Gates Jr., one of the nation’s elite scholars, after his arrest that smells a lot like racial profiling in Cambridge, Mass.

GATES: There are one million black men in jail in this country and last Thursday I was one of them. This is outrageous and that this is how poor black men across the country are treated everyday in the criminal justice system. It’s one thing to write about it, but altogether another to experience it.

Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/21/AR2009072101771.html?hpid=topnews

Ridiculous Charges Dropped Against Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.

It’s too bad the officers in question did not use better judgment from the beginning to escalate this situation into something that looks and smells an awful lot like racial profiling.

BOSTON — Prosecutors dropped a disorderly conduct charge Tuesday against prominent black scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr., who was arrested at his home near Harvard University after a report of a break-in.

The city of Cambridge issued a statement saying the arrest “was regrettable and unfortunate” and police and Gates agreed that dropping the charge was a just resolution.

“This incident should not be viewed as one that demeans the character and reputation of professor Gates or the character of the Cambridge Police Department,” the statement said.

Huffington Post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/21/henry-louis-gates-jr-arre_n_242010.html

Media Matters And Others Do The Right Thing Not Showing Erin Andrews Images

Media Matters for America is reporting that two news organizations have shown stills from the secretly-taken video of ESPN reporter Erin Andrews (reportedly with no or very few clothes on). It’s bad enough that some worthless idiot felt the need to exploit her in such a nasty way, but now people are piggybacking this situation to shock people by showing portions of the video while reporting the story.

This is from Media Matters:

Fox & Friends repeatedly aired numerous video stills from a videotape surreptitiously taken of ESPN sideline reporter Erin Andrews nude in a hotel room, while CBS’ The Early Show aired several seconds of the Andrews videotape with some of her body parts blurred.

More from Media Matters:

On July 21, Fox & Friends repeatedly aired numerous video stills from a videotape surreptitiously taken of ESPN sideline reporter Erin Andrews nude in a hotel room. Fox News’ stills, which were prominently displayed on-screen, repeatedly showed Andrews’ face while covering some of her body parts with lacy red tape. In addition, during CBS’ The Early Show, science and technology correspondent Daniel Sieberg played several seconds of the Andrews videotape with parts of her body blurred.

ESPN’s general counsel has reportedly written to at least one website stating that the “posting of these pictures are highly likely to render you an accessory after the fact to a criminal act,” while a lawyer for Andrews has “request[ed] respect of Erin’s privacy at this time.”

Reporter Kate Snow reported on the Andrews story for ABC’s Good Morning America during the 7 a.m. ET hour, but did not show stills or video from the videotape. ABC and ESPN are both owned by The Walt Disney Co.

While Media Matters for America regularly provides video for segments, Media Matters will not provide video or provide the still shots Fox News aired. The following are screen captures from the Fox & Friends segment and CBS segment with black boxes replacing footage and stills from the video.

I comment Media Matters for not sinking so low as to republish these photos that robbed Erin Andrews of her privacy while violating her in ways we all should find highly offensive and very illegal.

Demond Wilson, Angered By Rude Jesse Lee Peterson, Hangs Up


An interview with Demond Wilson, one of the former stars of the great 1970s comedy Sanford and Son, seems to go off stride as Jesse Lee Peterson presses him to talk politics and bash President Barack Obama, who has been in the office basically a minute. The hard-headed Peterson keeps jumping on Wilson while bashing President Obama and black people in general.

Peterson’s comments are consistently idiotic and highly rude and prove how little respect he has for his guests or for other people. Peterson is a bigot as proven by his hostile intolerance of those who disagree with him. This shows how vicious, partisan and ignorant Jesse Lee Peterson, aka Uncle Ruckus from The Boondocks, is.

If Jesse Lee Peterson was a cartoon character he would be Uncle Ruckus:

Peterson has a show and a platform because he pulls the Uncle Ruckus routine of being the black man who will go on television, on the radio or in print to bash black people without conscience.

Erin Andrews Story Is Disturbing, But Where Is The Link To Women Journalists Covering Sports?

erin-andrews-1

With interest, I wanted to read what sounds like a disturbing story surrounding ESPN reporter Erin Andrews, a hotel room, a peephole and a voyeuristic lowlife.

Here is an excerpt of a story from Yahoo Sports:

It’s never been easy for female sports journalists. From Lisa Olson being sexually harassed while covering the New England Patriots to Suzy Kolber having to fend off the advances of a drunk Joe Namath on national television to MMA reporter Loretta Hunt being called an unacceptable name for womenon camera by UFC president Dana White, women have had to overcome obstacles not faced by their male counterparts.

That doesn’t even take into account that women on television are judged for not just what they know but what they look like. Most female sports journalists have dealt with these difficulties with aplomb. However, they were magnified considerably this week when ESPN reporter Erin Andrews became a victim of video voyeurism after someone shot video of her in a private moment through her hotel room peephole.

In conjunction with ESPN and her attorney, Andrews is working with authorities to catch the perpetrators of this heinous act, but the damage has been done. Her privacy has been invaded, and the video of her naked body is out there. Most Web sites have deleted the video under threat of legal action, but that can’t undo the fact that it was shot and posted in the first place.

OK, so now I am thinking that something happened with regard to her performing her job and it involved some athlete who had gotten out of line with her and needed to be called out. That first paragraph seems to cite incidents involving women reporters put into bad positions by people during the course of doing work.

Now, this issue with Erin Andrews sounds more like a random jerk (or jerks) doing to the ESPN reporter what probably happens to a lot of women (celebrities or otherwise).

So, I am having a hard time seeing this as some kind of woman sports reporter civil rights issue (not that there are not challenges out there for women reporters covering male sports … there are).

Another excerpt:

Now that Andrews is a victim of this crime, why would a woman want to follow her on camera? That’s not the sort of thing that ESPN co-workers Chris Berman or Stuart Scott have to worry about.

What do Berman and Scott have to do with this particular issue?

Beyond the fact that she is a high-profile sports reporter, what does this have to do with sports?

She was not victimized while performing her job (based on what I read).

Rather than the Scott/Berman question, a better question would be to ask why the crime Andrews seems to be a victim of any different than other women (or men) filmed by perverts when they don’t know it. The writer (and I am not simply trying to attack) seems to be trying to make this into some kind of equality issue when it seems to be a crime that has nothing to do with sports other than the fact that she is a prominent sports reporter. I am not asserting that this is a story that should not be reported on, but I had a difficult time following the path the writer was headed down.

Let us hope that whoever perpetrated this crime is apprehended and punished appropriately.

So, Is A Prominent Havard University Being Charged With Living-In-A-Home-In-A-Good-Neighborhood-While-Black

gates

Henry Louis Gates Jr. one of the most respected scholars in the United States of America, may have become the latest victim of racial profiling. Essentially, it appears that Gates was harassed by police officers because he forced his way into his own home a woman reported seeing “two black males with backpacks on the porch” with one “wedging his shoulder into the door as if he was trying to force entry.” Ah, the infamous two black males accusation. Apparently, two black males look a little bit more suspect in an upscale neighborhood, huh?

This is an excerpt from a Yahoo News/AP story:

BOSTON – Supporters of a prominent Harvard University black scholar who was arrested at his own home by police responding to a report of a break-in say he is the victim of racial profiling.

Henry Louis Gates Jr. had forced his way through the front door of his home because it was jammed, his lawyer said Monday.

Cambridge police say they responded to the well-maintained two-story home near campus after a woman reported seeing “two black males with backpacks on the porch,” with one “wedging his shoulder into the door as if he was trying to force entry.”

By the time police arrived, Gates was already inside. Police say he refused to come outside to speak with an officer, who told him he was investigating a report of a break-in.

“Why, because I’m a black man in America?” Gates said, according to a police report written by Sgt. James Crowley. The Cambridge police refused to comment on the arrest Monday.

Gates — the director of Harvard’s W.E.B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research — initially refused to show the officer his identification, but then gave him a Harvard University ID card, according to police.

It’s a disturbing tale because it does make (or should make) a person wonder would white guys trying to get into a house have been perceived the same way.

More from the story:

“Gates continued to yell at me, accusing me of racial bias and continued to tell me that I had not heard the last of him,” the officer wrote.

Gates said he turned over his driver’s license and Harvard ID — both with his photos — and repeatedly asked for the name and badge number of the officer, who refused. He said he then followed the officer as he left his house onto his front porch, where he was handcuffed in front of other officers, Gates said in a statement released by his attorney, fellow Harvard scholar Charles Ogletree, on a Web site Gates oversees, TheRoot.com

He was arrested on a disorderly conduct charge after police said he “exhibited loud and tumultuous behavior.” He was released later that day on his own recognizance. An arraignment was scheduled for Aug. 26.

Gates, 58, also refused to speak publicly Monday, referring calls to Ogletree.

“He was shocked to find himself being questioned and shocked that the conversation continued after he showed his identification,” Ogletree said.

Yeah, why would a guy be upset about being harassed by police for trying to get into his own house and having a dime dropped on him by someone worried about the two black guys? The police come and harass a man getting into his own house and then arrest him on his own property for disorderly conduct. How much of an insult/slap in the face is that? I think most people would have “exhibited loud and tumultuous behavior” (how broad a description is that?) if they found themselves in a similar situation.

One more excerpt:

Allen Counter, who has taught neuroscience at Harvard for 25 years, said he was stopped on campus by two Harvard police officers in 2004 after being mistaken for a robbery suspect. They threatened to arrest him when he could not produce identification.

“We do not believe that this arrest would have happened if professor Gates was white,” Counter said. “It really has been very unsettling for African-Americans throughout Harvard and throughout Cambridge that this happened.”

It’s difficult (if not impossible) to get in the heads of the officers and the individual that called in the complaint. But, it is enough to make a lot of us pause and think about one of the many faces of racism – even in the Obama era.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Foolish Right-Wing Nuts Still Sounding Crazy About Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate


The nuts on the far right of the political spectrum are beginning to look increasingly unstable as they manufacture conspiracy theories about President Obama’s place of birth and whether or not he really is a citizen of the United States of American (one of the necessary requirements to become president). These nuts, led by bitter Alan Keyes who has been whipped politically by Obama, continue to advance useless speculation and waste time and resources pursuing ghosts.

Here is the transcript from Lou Dobbs’ CNN show guest-hosted by Kitty Pilgrim. Even as Pilgrim confronts the two player-hater guests with a mountain of evidence and facts, they still are unsatisfied.

Frankly, I thought Keyes was nuts, but that lawyer (Orly Taitz) makes him look composed, rational and credible.

Here is the transcript from Media Matters for America:

PILGRIM: Well, an Army Reserve major is again raising controversy over President Obama’s place of birth. Now, the major challenged his deployment orders, claiming that President Obama wasn’t born in the United States, and that renders his orders illegal.

Now, a former presidential candidate, Alan Keyes, also filed a lawsuit challenging the president’s right to hold an office, and a hearing will be — on that suit will be held on Monday.

Now, questions about the president’s place of birth have been asked and answered many times since before the election, and the president’s birth certificate says he was born in Hawaii. The state’s Republican governor and other officials have backed that up. CNN has fully investigated the issue, found no basis for the questions about the president’s birthplace, but the controversy lives on, especially on the Internet.

Joining me now is Orly Taitz, and she represents the Army major and filed the Keyes lawsuit. Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes joins us. And on the other side, John Avlon, who is a columnist for the DailyBeast.com and author of Independent Nation; and Errol Louis, columnist for the New York Daily News and a CNN contributor, also an attorney.

And so, let me, just before we start, bear with me a bit. There’s overwhelming evidence that proves that his birth certificate is real, and that he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961. If you’ll just bear with me, I’ll run through a little bit of the evidence, and then we can get to this discussion. Now, the Annenberg Political Fact Check, which is a nonpartisan group, went to Chicago to view the birth certificate last year, and they released photos and this statement, “FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Our conclusion: Obama was born in the U.S.A. just as he always has said.”

The Republican governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, on record, she says Obama was indeed born in her state, and we should note, she did support John McCain. So, we also have a copy of the Honolulu Advertiser, the newspaper, August 13, and the Hawaii Star-Bulletin, August 14, 1961, both announcing Barack Obama’s birth.

Also, October last year, the director of the Hawaii Department of Health wrote a letter, stating, “I have personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedure.”

PolitiFact.com reissued their results from their investigation they conducted in June of last year, and they say, quote, “Since we published Obama’s birth certificate, questions about its authenticity have been frequent and fierce. After reviewing the evidence, we are confident of our rulings.”

And this is the last one; thanks for bearing with me. The White House press briefing this week, reporter from the WorldNetDaily pressed again about the birth certificate. The White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said this following comment:

GIBBS (video clip): Do all of your listeners and the listeners throughout this country the service to which any journalist owes those listeners, and that is the pursuit of the noble truth, and the noble truth is that the president was born in Hawaii, a state of the United States of America.

PILGRIM: Now, Alan Keyes, you’ve been patient letting me get through all that, but what more do you need to be convinced?

KEYES: Some evidence. And the evidence is something that President Obama is strenuously blocking. You ask me to prove that I was born in New York City at the time and hospital I say, and I will give you a certified copy of a full birth certificate with a doctor’s signature, the hospital, and everything else. I won’t direct you to some photograph on the Internet and a bunch of hearsay statements that would not be accepted as evidence in any court of law.

And so the very simple question is: Why spend $800,000 to a million dollars blocking the birth certificate, blocking records at school and college that would in any way have a bearing on the question –

PILGRIM: All right, Alan –

KEYES: — both of his birth and of his citizenship claims at various times in his life.

PILGRIM: Let me let –

KEYES: Why is he going to all this trouble if, as they say, the matter is resolved? Can’t be resolved by a bunch of statements and assertions.

PILGRIM: OK, Orly, we have to keep this quicker –

TAITZ: Yes.

PILGRIM: — but please tell me what you –

TAITZ: OK, Obama never provided his birth certificate. What he provided is certification of live birth that was issued last year that does not have the name of the doctor, does not have the name of the hospital, does not have any signatures. Do you know that Hawaii has a statute, 338, that allows foreign-born children of Hawaiian residence to get Hawaiian birth certificates? Did you know that?

PILGRIM: Errol, I would like you to respond.

LOUIS: Listen, I think — I think what we have here is a case where under the guise of saying, well, we can’t trust whether or not he should be president because we don’t have the evidence, it’s actually the reverse. These are folks — and there are a number of them, and some of them are raising money, like WorldNetDaily, which is as far as I’m concerned, running a scam, where they’re selling all kinds of bumper stickers and stuff like that. And I don’t know what Miss Taitz is taking in the way of legal fees.

TAITZ: Excuse me, if you –

LOUIS: They’re raising legal fees from across the country –

TAITZ: I’m doing this pro bono.

PILGRIM: All right.

LOUIS: — and the reality is they don’t accept –

TAITZ: It’s pro bono.

LOUIS: — they don’t accept that the president is the president –

TAITZ: No, no, no, no.

LOUIS: — and, therefore, they work backward and there will never be enough proof to satisfy them.

PILGRIM: All right, John, I have to let –

AVLON: You’ve offered a mountain of evidence in addition to two birth announcements. That’s a pretty deep conspiracy. What we have here –

TAITZ: Can I respond to this?

AVLON: No.

PILGRIM: In just one second.

AVLON: What we have here is Obama derangement syndrome. This is pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism.

TAITZ: This is nonsense. This is total nonsense. You have never investigated this.

AVLON: Ambassador Keyes says that President Obama has called him a radical communist.

TAITZ: This is absolutely irrelevant. Sir, this is absolutely irrelevant.

AVLON: You on your blog have repeatedly referred to the administration as Gestapo SS. Which is it? Get your story straight. Is he a Nazi or a communist? You guys are nuts.

TAITZ: You don’t know what you’re talking about.

PILGRIM: Orly, I have to ask you to let everyone at least have their say before you respond to it.

TAITZ: OK.

PILGRIM: I believe we’re out of time, I’m sorry to say. Great discussion. Orly Taitz, Alan Keyes, Errol Louis, and John Avlon.

TAITZ: You know what, let me just mention one more thing. In order to be the president, you have to have two parents that are citizens. Obama’s father was never a citizen of this country.

PILGRIM: All right.

TAITZ: He was a British citizen.

PILGRIM: Orly, we have to call it there. I’m sorry. Thank you very much — all of you — for joining in this very lively debate.

Another attack on Barack Obama that I doubt few (if any) other people who served as president of the United States of America ever had to deal with.

It makes me wonder why.

Big Hollywood Writer Singles Out Minorities for Attack

The backlash against minorities continues to build since the election of Barack Obama as president of the United States of America. Now, in reality, this is hardly an unexpected occurrence as many older members of the Republican and conservative wing of the political spectrum are angry. The country they knew is slipping away and what many of these individuals see is the browning of America. And, they don’t like it one bit. These bitter and angry individuals show their frustration with the severe backlash to anything even remotely resembling affirmative action and with illegal immigration (with the way that the Latino population in this country is growing and the projections for the future).

This all brings me to a blog published on Big Hollywood by a man named Brian Jennings. Jennings goes on and on about how the country is going into debt (conservatives didn’t care as much about it when George W. Bush was president) and then laments bailouts (or potential bailouts) for minority broadcasters.

Here is what Jennings wrote (with the graphic included):

Well if we can spend millions to protect the salt marsh mouse in San Francisco Bay, we can surely shell out billions to bail out minority broadcasters. It’s good for the economy and after all Congress is on record as saying it needs to save our nation’s newspapers, too. So, the table is set for government financial intervention of the media.

Minority broadcasters are asking tax-cheat Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for financial assistance. Sounds like the financial and auto industries, and it is. These broadcasters, including the National Association of Black Owned Broadcasters, the Inner City Broadcasting Coalition, the Spanish Broadcasting System, and others say they can bounce back because “unlike the auto business, broadcasting has been healthy for many years.” Has it now?

Jennings continues:

As the nation digs itself further into debt and unemployment continues to increase, media is being hit as hard as any sector. But, there is an important point to be made. Perhaps suspect business models should be allowed to fail. If there is bailout money for minority broadcasters, what about bailout money for the nation’s non-minority broadcasters who face what many believe is their only path – bankruptcy. The answer to that is a forgone conclusion. Minorities will get a bailout because after all they are minorities and deserve special treatment. But, other broadcasters – especially the consolidated media will not get a dime. No media should be bailed out.

It’s the same old politics of fear in regard to under-qualified minorities supposedly getting so muchspecial treatment while “others” work sooooooooooooo hard and, well you know, just can’t get a break.

Jennings seems to think that minorities get all of this special treatment that “other broadcasters” don’t seem to get.

I doubt Jennings, or others like him, truly would want to trade positions with minorities.

He makes some reasonable points in regard to conflict of interest if the media is taking money (in the form of a bailout). So, maybe no media should be bailed out, but to take an obvious and angry shot at minorities (the way this writer did) has a bit of a smell of resentment and perhaps racism to it.

He also took an angry, partisan cheap shot at Timothy Geithner.

More On Barbara Boxer, Harry Alford Racial Confrontation

This is an outline of the testimony of Harry C. Alford, president and CEO of the National Black Chamber of Commerce. This was submitted to the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (chaired by Sen. Barbara Boxer) on July 16, 2009.

Alford was well-researched and seemed prepared for the hearing.

I wanted to post this and then offer some random thoughts and questions.

Here is the testimony (the link is provided below):

Madam Chairwoman, ladies and gentlemen of the Committee. On behalf of the National Black Chamber of Commerce (NBCC), thank you for the opportunity to address you today.

I come to you, not as an economist, but with a deep understanding of small and minority-owned businesses and as someone who has experience with consumer behavior.

Climate change is a vital issue that must be addressed. It will take time and cost real money to mitigate humanity’s influence on our climate. The thing that concerns me and many of the 95,000 business members of the National Black Chamber is that any legislation Congress enacts must consider the impact that costs will have on small and minority-owned businesses, their ability to create jobs and the impact on the communities that they serve.

Regretfully, the current legislation out of the U.S. House of Representatives will negatively impact the most vulnerable of our society. I’m sure that those who proposed it had the best intentions, but the bill doesn’t do what it’s supposed to do, and it does so at a very high cost — especially high for working families and small business owners.

I learned a long time ago to beware of any document that has more authors than readers. The fact that so few people have actually read the House bill may explain why the full costs that American businesses and everyday people would shoulder are not readily apparent. Let me quote from a recent study that we did with CRA International:

· Businesses and consumers will face higher energy and transportation costs that could lead to increased costs of other goods and services throughout the economy;

· Household disposable income and household consumption would fall. Purchasing power would decline by $730 in 2015 and $940 in 2050, adjusted against 2010 base income levels;

· Wages and returns on investment would fall, lowering productivity growth and reducing employment opportunities. Wages would decline $170 a year by 2015, $390 a year by 2030 and $960 a year by 2050;

· Green jobs gained would be swamped by jobs lost in old industries and businesses, leading to a net loss of 2.3 million to 2.7 million jobs.

These impacts, the study found, would differ across regions, across industries and across income levels depending on changes in local energy costs and on allocation formulas for permits. And that worries me and my members because the black community suffers mightily when the economy goes south.

Finally, there’s the issue of how this House bill would limit our ability to compete internationally. Our study found that there is no environmental impact to justify this loss of income and siphoning away our nation’s wealth as long as developing nations such as China and India aren’t part of the program. They’ll be happy to open the factories and the businesses we can’t afford to build here. Our report also highlighted that U.S. emissions would exceed the caps put on them by 30% due to international offsets, resulting in a transfer of wealth varying from $40 billion to $60 billion per year from 2012 to 2030. In other words, we’re going to send roughly $700 billion to $1 trillion abroad to make up for 30% higher pollution here. Combine these costs with the kind of badly-needed potential revenue we would be leaving on the table by giving away 85% of the emissions permits.

I opposed the massive bail out of Wall Street last fall because it sent the wrong signal by rewarding the wrong people, the ones who got us into our current mess. Now we’re contemplating handing the reins of our economy over to emissions traders on Wall Street who will deal in politically-generated emissions permits and foreign offsets. The inherent complexity of a government-regulated emissions system, especially with an unenforceable international component, sets the stage for a perpetual struggle for political handouts. And that is a recipe for corruption, not for emissions reductions.

The bottom line is this: any climate legislation that fails to meaningfully reduce the human impact on the climate or does so in an economically unsustainable manner, can’t be effective. Under the House bill, American consumers and businesses would take on a heavy burden. This burden would fall at exactly the wrong time.

While consumers may not have much choice but to pay the higher energy costs that would be passed onto them if the current legislation becomes law, the actions they would take to deal with those costs would affect us all. They would buy less and delay their purchasing decisions – exactly the opposite of what we need to lift ourselves out of our historic economic dilemma. Further, many low-income families and those on fixed incomes will have to make even tougher choices. Imagine the elderly woman who has to choose between heating her home and purchasing the food that she needs.

Another thing will happen, too. When those consumers lose their jobs as a result of cap-andtrade legislation – including those who may ultimately be encouraging you to vote for it – they will come looking for someone to blame. And that someone could be their elected officials.

I urge the Senate to take a different path. – one that marries our need to address climate change with our economic realities.

I’m not a climate change expert, but I have to believe that there are better options than the one currently on the table. I saw an article the other day in the San Francisco Chronicle that cited Elaine Kamarck, former advisor to Vice President Al Gore. She just released a paper on the historical politics surrounding climate change legislation in the U.S. She said, “If we can design a policy that is transparent and easy for people to understand, puts an effective price on carbon, and reimburses average Americans for all or nearly all of their increased costs, we have a chance of reversing climate change in a timely manner.”

She also said that “no major policy change has ever occurred without first getting the politics right.”

I think she’s spot on, but I’d add that it’s equally important to get the economics right. If we don’t, we won’t truly get to where we want to be on the climate front, the economic front, or any other front. I thank you for your time and look forward to answering any questions you may have.

First off … Barbara Boxer is NOT a racist, but she did seem to be racial in her interaction with Alford.

If Alford was brought to this hearing to speak on behalf of black people, then why would Boxer turn around and seemingly attempt to discredit him (trying to say he was not honest about where he lived and then putting up differing black views)? It was as if she (or her committee as a whole) brought Alford to the hearing to try and embarrass him.

I am not saying there’s anything wrong with differing views, but why were people representing these differing views not speaking to the committee in person?

If she or other committee members did not believe Alford was an accurate representation of the so-called black community, then where were others who could give a more broad representation of the so-called black community?

Where were these other black leaders she cited, why were just their statements put into the record by Boxer, why was Alford even invited and why did Boxer’s committee invite him to turn around and attempt, seemingly, to discredit his opinion?

In a subsequent interview, Alford (who claims to be an independent) I think went a bit overboard, but I can understand why he’s upset about his treatment.

Sen. Boxer, who seemed to be talking down to Alford, did not seem to learn pretty much anything from her disrespectful and arrogant treatment of Brig. Gen. Michael Walsh.

Senate testimony:
http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=3f34f593-8c87-46f2-bba7-f622481ecfb2

President Obama Speaks To The NAACP

Here is the speech for President Obama to deliver before the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. It’s the centennial celebration of the NAACP which was established in 1909. It’s a historic time for the organization and how amazing it was for the first black president of the United States of America to be delivering such an important address to the historic civil rights organization that was fighting for minorities when few others could have cared less whether they lived or died.

Remarks of President Barack Obama – As Prepared for Delivery

NAACP Centennial

New York, New York

July 16, 2009

It is an honor to be here, in the city where the NAACP was formed, to mark its centennial. What we celebrate tonight is not simply the journey the NAACP has traveled, but the journey that we, as Americans, have traveled over the past one hundred years.

It is a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act, and Brown v. Board of Education; back to an America just a generation past slavery. It was a time when Jim Crow was a way of life; when lynchings were all too common; and when race riots were shaking cities across a segregated land.

It was in this America where an Atlanta scholar named W.E.B. Du Bois, a man of towering intellect and a fierce passion for justice, sparked what became known as the Niagara movement; where reformers united, not by color but cause; and where an association was born that would, as its charter says, promote equality and eradicate prejudice among citizens of the United States.

From the beginning, Du Bois understood how change would come – just as King and all the civil rights giants did later. They understood that unjust laws needed to be overturned; that legislation needed to be passed; and that Presidents needed to be pressured into action. They knew that the stain of slavery and the sin of segregation had to be lifted in the courtroom and in the legislature.

But they also knew that here, in America, change would have to come from the people. It would come from people protesting lynching, rallying against violence, and walking instead of taking the bus. It would come from men and women – of every age and faith, race and region – taking Greyhounds on Freedom Rides; taking seats at Greensboro lunch counters; and registering voters in rural Mississippi, knowing they would be harassed, knowing they would be beaten, knowing that they might never return.

Because of what they did, we are a more perfect union. Because Jim Crow laws were overturned, black CEOs today run Fortune 500 companies. Because civil rights laws were passed, black mayors, governors, and Members of Congress serve in places where they might once have been unable to vote. And because ordinary people made the civil rights movement their own, I made a trip to Springfield a couple years ago – where Lincoln once lived, and race riots once raged – and began the journey that has led me here tonight as the 44th President of the United States of America.

And yet, even as we celebrate the remarkable achievements of the past one hundred years; even as we inherit extraordinary progress that cannot be denied; even as we marvel at the courage and determination of so many plain folks – we know that too many barriers still remain.

We know that even as our economic crisis batters Americans of all races, African Americans are out of work more than just about anyone else – a gap that’s widening here in New York City, as detailed in a report this week by Comptroller Bill Thompson.

We know that even as spiraling health care costs crush families of all races, African Americans are more likely to suffer from a host of diseases but less likely to own health insurance than just about anyone else.

We know that even as we imprison more people of all races than any nation in the world, an African-American child is roughly five times as likely as a white child to see the inside of a jail.

And we know that even as the scourge of HIV/AIDS devastates nations abroad, particularly in Africa, it is devastating the African-American community here at home with disproportionate force.

These are some of the barriers of our time. They’re very different from the barriers faced by earlier generations. They’re very different from the ones faced when fire hoses and dogs were being turned on young marchers; when Charles Hamilton Houston and a group of young Howard lawyers were dismantling segregation.

But what is required to overcome today’s barriers is the same as was needed then. The same commitment. The same sense of urgency. The same sense of sacrifice. The same willingness to do our part for ourselves and one another that has always defined America at its best.

The question, then, is where do we direct our efforts? What steps do we take to overcome these barriers? How do we move forward in the next one hundred years?

The first thing we need to do is make real the words of your charter and eradicate prejudice, bigotry, and discrimination among citizens of the United States. I understand there may be a temptation among some to think that discrimination is no longer a problem in 2009. And I believe that overall, there’s probably never been less discrimination in America than there is today.

But make no mistake: the pain of discrimination is still felt in America. By African-American women paid less for doing the same work as colleagues of a different color and gender. By Latinos made to feel unwelcome in their own country. By Muslim Americans viewed with suspicion for simply kneeling down to pray. By our gay brothers and sisters, still taunted, still attacked, still denied their rights.

On the 45th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act, discrimination must not stand. Not on account of color or gender; how you worship or who you love. Prejudice has no place in the United States of America.

But we also know that prejudice and discrimination are not even the steepest barriers to opportunity today. The most difficult barriers include structural inequalities that our nation’s legacy of discrimination has left behind; inequalities still plaguing too many communities and too often the object of national neglect.

These are barriers we are beginning to tear down by rewarding work with an expanded tax credit; making housing more affordable; and giving ex-offenders a second chance. These are barriers that we are targeting through our White House Office on Urban Affairs, and through Promise Neighborhoods that build on Geoffrey Canada’s success with the Harlem Children’s Zone; and that foster a comprehensive approach to ending poverty by putting all children on a pathway to college, and giving them the schooling and support to get there.

But our task of reducing these structural inequalities has been made more difficult by the state, and structure, of the broader economy; an economy fueled by a cycle of boom and bust; an economy built not on a rock, but sand. That is why my administration is working so hard not only to create and save jobs in the short-term, not only to extend unemployment insurance and help for people who have lost their health care, not only to stem this immediate economic crisis, but to lay a new foundation for growth and prosperity that will put opportunity within reach not just for African Americans, but for all Americans.

One pillar of this new foundation is health insurance reform that cuts costs, makes quality health coverage affordable for all, and closes health care disparities in the process. Another pillar is energy reform that makes clean energy profitable, freeing America from the grip of foreign oil, putting people to work upgrading low-income homes, and creating jobs that cannot be outsourced. And another pillar is financial reform with consumer protections to crack down on mortgage fraud and stop predatory lenders from targeting our poor communities.

All these things will make America stronger and more competitive. They will drive innovation, create jobs, and provide families more security. Still, even if we do it all, the African-American community will fall behind in the United States and the United States will fall behind in the world unless we do a far better job than we have been doing of educating our sons and daughters. In the 21st century – when so many jobs will require a bachelor’s degree or more, when countries that out-educate us today will outcompete us tomorrow – a world-class education is a prerequisite for success.

You know what I’m talking about. There’s a reason the story of the civil rights movement was written in our schools. There’s a reason Thurgood Marshall took up the cause of Linda Brown. There’s a reason the Little Rock Nine defied a governor and a mob. It’s because there is no stronger weapon against inequality and no better path to opportunity than an education that can unlock a child’s God-given potential.

Yet, more than a half century after Brown v. Board of Education, the dream of a world-class education is still being deferred all across this country. African-American students are lagging behind white classmates in reading and math – an achievement gap that is growing in states that once led the way on civil rights. Over half of all African-American students are dropping out of school in some places. There are overcrowded classrooms, crumbling schools, and corridors of shame in America filled with poor children – black, brown, and white alike.

The state of our schools is not an African-American problem; it’s an American problem. And if Al Sharpton, Mike Bloomberg, and Newt Gingrich can agree that we need to solve it, then all of us can agree on that. All of us can agree that we need to offer every child in this country the best education the world has to offer from the cradle through a career.

That is our responsibility as the United States of America. And we, all of us in government, are working to do our part by not only offering more resources, but demanding more reform.

When it comes to higher education, we are making college and advanced training more affordable, and strengthening community colleges that are a gateway to so many with an initiative that will prepare students not only to earn a degree but find a job when they graduate; an initiative that will help us meet the goal I have set of leading the world in college degrees by 2020.

We are creating a Race to the Top Fund that will reward states and public school districts that adopt 21st century standards and assessments. And we are creating incentives for states to promote excellent teachers and replace bad ones – because the job of a teacher is too important for us to accept anything but the best.

We should also explore innovative approaches being pursued here in New York City; innovations like Bard High School Early College and Medgar Evers College Preparatory School that are challenging students to complete high school and earn a free associate’s degree or college credit in just four years.

And we should raise the bar when it comes to early learning programs. Today, some early learning programs are excellent. Some are mediocre. And some are wasting what studies show are – by far – a child’s most formative years.

That’s why I have issued a challenge to America’s governors: if you match the success of states like Pennsylvania and develop an effective model for early learning; if you focus reform on standards and results in early learning programs; if you demonstrate how you will prepare the lowest income children to meet the highest standards of success – you can compete for an Early Learning Challenge Grant that will help prepare all our children to enter kindergarten ready to learn.

So, these are some of the laws we are passing. These are some of the policies we are enacting. These are some of the ways we are doing our part in government to overcome the inequities, injustices, and barriers that exist in our country.

But all these innovative programs and expanded opportunities will not, in and of themselves, make a difference if each of us, as parents and as community leaders, fail to do our part by encouraging excellence in our children. Government programs alone won’t get our children to the Promised Land. We need a new mindset, a new set of attitudes – because one of the most durable and destructive legacies of discrimination is the way that we have internalized a sense of limitation; how so many in our community have come to expect so little of ourselves.

We have to say to our children, Yes, if you’re African American, the odds of growing up amid crime and gangs are higher. Yes, if you live in a poor neighborhood, you will face challenges that someone in a wealthy suburb does not. But that’s not a reason to get bad grades, that’s not a reason to cut class, that’s not a reason to give up on your education and drop out of school. No one has written your destiny for you. Your destiny is in your hands – and don’t you forget that.

To parents, we can’t tell our kids to do well in school and fail to support them when they get home. For our kids to excel, we must accept our own responsibilities. That means putting away the Xbox and putting our kids to bed at a reasonable hour. It means attending those parent-teacher conferences, reading to our kids, and helping them with their homework.

And it means we need to be there for our neighbor’s son or daughter, and return to the day when we parents let each other know if we saw a child acting up. That’s the meaning of community. That’s how we can reclaim the strength, the determination, the hopefulness that helped us come as far as we already have.

It also means pushing our kids to set their sights higher. They might think they’ve got a pretty good jump shot or a pretty good flow, but our kids can’t all aspire to be the next LeBron or Lil Wayne. I want them aspiring to be scientists and engineers, doctors and teachers, not just ballers and rappers. I want them aspiring to be a Supreme Court Justice. I want them aspiring to be President of the United States.

So, yes, government must be a force for opportunity. Yes, government must be a force for equality. But ultimately, if we are to be true to our past, then we also have to seize our own destiny, each and every day.

That is what the NAACP is all about. The NAACP was not founded in search of a handout. The NAACP was not founded in search of favors. The NAACP was founded on a firm notion of justice; to cash the promissory note of America that says all our children, all God’s children, deserve a fair chance in the race of life.

It is a simple dream, and yet one that has been denied – one still being denied – to so many Americans. It’s a painful thing, seeing that dream denied. I remember visiting a Chicago school in a rough neighborhood as a community organizer, and thinking how remarkable it was that all of these children seemed so full of hope, despite being born into poverty, despite being delivered into addiction, despite all the obstacles they were already facing.

And I remember the principal of the school telling me that soon all of that would begin to change; that soon, the laughter in their eyes would begin to fade; that soon, something would shut off inside, as it sunk in that their hopes would not come to pass – not because they weren’t smart enough, not because they weren’t talented enough, but because, by accident of birth, they didn’t have a fair chance in life.

So, I know what can happen to a child who doesn’t have that chance. But I also know what can happen to a child who does. I was raised by a single mother. I don’t come from a lot of wealth. I got into my share of trouble as a kid. My life could easily have taken a turn for the worse. But that mother of mine gave me love; she pushed me, and cared about my education; she took no lip and taught me right from wrong. Because of her, I had a chance to make the most of my abilities. I had the chance to make the most of my opportunities. I had the chance to make the most of life.

The same story holds for Michelle. The same story holds for so many of you. And I want all the other Barack Obamas out there, and all the other Michelle Obamas out there, to have that same chance – the chance that my mother gave me; that my education gave me; that the United States of America gave me. That is how our union will be perfected and our economy rebuilt. That is how America will move forward in the next one hundred years.

And we will move forward. This I know – for I know how far we have come. Last week, in Ghana, Michelle and I took Malia and Sasha to Cape Coast Castle, where captives were once imprisoned before being auctioned; where, across an ocean, so much of the African-American experience began. There, reflecting on the dungeon beneath the castle church, I was reminded of all the pain and all the hardships, all the injustices and all the indignities on the voyage from slavery to freedom.

But I was also reminded of something else. I was reminded that no matter how bitter the rod or how stony the road, we have persevered. We have not faltered, nor have we grown weary. As Americans, we have demanded, strived for, and shaped a better destiny.

That is what we are called to do once more. It will not be easy. It will take time. Doubts may rise and hopes recede.

But if John Lewis could brave Billy clubs to cross a bridge, then I know young people today can do their part to lift up our communities.

If Emmet Till’s uncle Mose Wright could summon the courage to testify against the men who killed his nephew, I know we can be better fathers and brothers, mothers and sisters in our own families.

If three civil rights workers in Mississippi – black and white, Christian and Jew, city-born and country-bred – could lay down their lives in freedom’s cause, I know we can come together to face down the challenges of our own time. We can fix our schools, heal our sick, and rescue our youth from violence and despair.

One hundred years from now, on the 200th anniversary of the NAACP, let it be said that this generation did its part; that we too ran the race; that full of the faith that our dark past has taught us, full of the hope that the present has brought us, we faced, in our own lives and all across this nation, the rising sun of a new day begun. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.

Coverage of President Obama’s speech to the NAACP:

CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/14/obama.naacp/index.html

Yahoo News/AP:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090716/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_naacp