Are U.S. Supreme Court Right Wingers Set To Show True Bias Against President Obama?

Rumors abound that some of the U.S. Supreme Court justices are considering not attending the President's upcoming State of the Union address.

It was a topic of discussion this past weekend on Fox News Sunday as U.S. Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer was interviewed.

Some of the justices apparently have their panties in a bunch because President Barack Obama was critical of one of their decisions.

If these justices are that weak, that they can't take that little bit of criticism, then that truly is disturbing.

BUT, if they are whining and pouting because they are upset with the politics of what President Obama said, then that is pathetic.

Aren't judges/justices supposed to be impartial? Would their protest (should it happen) be indicative of a U.S. Supreme Court that truly is political?

From Crooks and Liars:

During his 2010 State of the Union address, Obama criticized the court's Citizens United decision which said that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts cannot be limited.

"With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections," Obama said.

"Well, I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, and worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’d urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps corrects some of these problems," he added.

While Democratic lawmakers cheered for the president's remarks, Justice Samuel Alito could be seen mouthing the words "not true."

Weeks later, Chief Justice John Roberts said the address had "degenerated to a political pep rally."

"The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering, while the court -- according to the requirements of protocol -- has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling," Roberts said to University of Alabama law students.

It will be interesting to see what whiners like John Roberts, Sam Alito and high-court right wingers do.

Crooks and Liars:
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/justice-breyer-very-important-attend-state-u

Jim Quinn Calling Anyone Racist Is Laughable … Although …

… maybe conservative radio show host Jim Quinn speaks from the voice of experience in regards to being a racist. Rather than focus on his own racism, he chooses to manufacture racism in others.

Here is what Quinn, as documented by Media Matters for America, had to say about Judge Sonia Sotomayor as she is embarking on her confirmation hearings for a spot on the U.S. Supreme Court:

QUINN (ON SOTOMAYOR): A racist woman with a racial chip on her shoulder, steeped in identity politics.

Here is how one person responded on Media Matters for America: Quinn: A racist man with a racial chip on his shoulder, steeped in stupidity.

This is from the Daily Kos quoting Wiki:

On November 6, 2008, Quinn compared modern welfare recipients to slaves, saying “You know, if you were a slave in the old South, what did you get as a slave? You got free room and board, you got free money, and you got rewarded for having children because that was just, you know, tomorrow’s slave. … Can I ask a question? How’s that different from welfare? You get a free house, you get free food, and you get rewarded for having children. Oh, wait a minute, hold on a second. There is a difference: The slave had to work for it.” Quinn apologized for that remark. However, he has not apologized for his June 24, 2008 statement, “Slavery was evil, there’s no question about that. But you know what? If it hadn’t happened, where would you be right now? If your ancestors hadn’t come over here for whatever reason where would you be right now? You’d be floating down a river in Rwanda in pieces or maybe you’d be chased down by a machete wielding Janjaweed militia in the Sudan or starving under Robert Mugabe. Hey, ingrates, get on your knees, kiss the American dirt beneath you and please shut up.”

Here is another Quinn beauty:

On The War Room with Quinn & Rose, Jim Quinn said: “You know, if you were a slave in the old South, what did you get as a slave? You got free room and board, you got free money, and you got rewarded for having children because that was just, you know, tomorrow’s slave. … Can I ask a question? How’s that different from welfare? You get a free house, you get free food, and you get rewarded for having children. Oh, wait a minute, hold on a second. There is a difference: The slave had to work for it.”

What an interesting despicable way of repackaging slavery and trying to put a bow tie on the atrocity of slavery. But, should we expect anything less from Jim Quinn.

Media Matters:
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907130035