Showing posts with label Bill O'Reilly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bill O'Reilly. Show all posts

Thursday, November 26, 2015

You Won't Have Obama to Blame for Racial Sins

President Barack Obama
I doubt that anyone, even the most loyal fans of President Obama, will tell you that he has been what you would consider a perfect president. Of course, have we ever had a perfect president in the history of our union? Think about that and let me know, seriously.

I started to think about that as I read a CNN analysis piece that focused on race relations worsening during the Obama presidency. This headline, of course, popped up in my Facebook news feed (along with probably items from the hundreds of pages I have come to "like" during my time with a profile on the social media giant.

I digress.

Have race relations worsened under Barack Obama's presidency? A majority of those surveyed (CNN and Kaiser Family Foundation polling) said, "yes" -- rather emphatically so.

I get why some would feel this way. So, the poll suggested that "racial strife" is getting worse. Poll results further indicated that tensions among Americans of different ethnic/racial groups has increased. About 64 percent of Americans believe this to be true, including 67 percent of whites, 65 percent of blacks and 55 percent of Latinos.

Is it worse? I can appreciate how some people would see it that way. The real question is: Why is it worse (if that is what you believe)?

I do not believe it is worse. I believe that it is simply been brought from the closet to the front porch. Regardless of how you feel, the sentiments of the Tea Party and Black Lives Matter (not necessarily to equate the two, but to make a bigger point) were always there. Certain incidents, however, opened the door for individuals affiliated with these two movements to become more activist and vocal. For the Tea Party, you could argue it was the election of Barack Obama, the first black president. For Black Lives Matter, it appears to be incidents involving black people and the police.

The growing power of social media and video have given certain movements more power than they could have had in even the 1980s.

But, none of this is about Barack Obama. Feel free to try and ultimately fail to link it to the Obama presidency.

The headline of the article I linked, above, asks an important question about who will be blamed for race relations in the post-Obama era. It's a good question, indeed. Because, if you're foolish enough to believe racial issues will vanish once Obama leaves the presidency, then you were probably foolish enough to believe it started the day he became a viable presidential candidate and after he took office.

As Billy Joel once famously sang, "We didn't start the fire. It was always burning since the world's been turning ... No, we didn't light it though we tried to fight it."

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

O'Reilly, Criticism, Blacks


I found this quite interesting. Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly had interesting comments related to what has been happening in Ferguson, Mo.

This is how he was quoted by Media Matters:
O'REILLY: Do we as a society -- what do we do? Do we weigh in as the boy's father -- and if it were my son, I probably would have said same thing, but he's obviously talking through an emotional prism. His son is dead. He believes, probably -- I know he believes -- that it was an injustice, that it was done for nothing, it was a murder. And many, many African Americans believe that without knowing the facts. Do we criticize them, or do we remain silent?
O'Reilly has never really been shy about criticizing black folks. So, it's hard to understand where he's coming from with this one.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Mr. West ... You're No Harriet Tubman


As usual, when Fox News needs to attack black folks, one of its favorite people to call upon is Rep. Allen West, who absurdly likens himself (I can't even make this up) to a modern-day Harrien Tubman ... LOL.

You can visit the link and read about his delusions of grandeur (only on Fox News). It honestly sort of destroys all future credibility, but we'll proceed anyway.

West made a stop on Bill O'Reilly's Fox News show to take some shots at the Congressional Black Caucus. It was mainly so he could attack Rep. Andre Carson for some strong words he used in going after the so-called tea party when he said some of them would "love to see you and me ... hanging on a tree." Obviously, those are strong words and over the top, but I think it's fairly clear that the tea party has a fairly Republican agenda that is out of step with the way most black people tend to feel.

O'Reilly had to love having West on to attack the CBC. It was sort of black-on-black crime.

It's ironic, as News Hounds points out, that O'Reilly would welcome Rep. West as a guest on the show to attach the CBC. West is the same one who launched a vicious attach against rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (largely applauded by O'Reilly and numerous others on the far right of the political spectrum). You may recall, the thin-skinned West was lightly challenged by Wasserman Schultz and, with his ego bruised, called her:

Florida GOP Congressman Allen West this afternoon dispatched a scathing personal email to Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, calling her "vile, unprofessional ,and despicable," "a coward," "characterless," and "not a Lady," and demanding that she "shut the heck up."

I thought I would add a bit of that reminder of what O'Reilly's pal Mr. West said to attack Wasserman Schultz.

Apparently, O'Reilly has no problem with that kind of rhetoric against a liberal woman, but there is a problem when he sees someone from the CBC attack the so-called tea party.

Strange ... he likes to verbally attack some women, but yet he thinks he is Harriet Tubman. If he starts dressing like Harriet Tubman then things really get scary.


NOTE: (In reference to the photo) I am not necessarily calling West a raging psychopath based on this photo I found on the Internet. But I did think there was some satirical value to the contrast the person who put this photo illustration together saw.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Interesting Interview With O'Reilly And Rapper Lupe Fiasco


Conservative Fox News talk show host Bill O'Reilly was in the zone as he hosted rapper Lupe Fiasco, who referred to President Obama and all presidents of the United States as "terrorists."

O'Reilly puts rappers on a pedestal to inflate their political influence so he can portray them as too black and too dangerous as he tries to tear them down.

Notice in the interview how condescending O'Reilly is as he talks to his guest. It's not an accident.

As a side note, O'Reilly hosted this segment also to disingenuously appear unbiased by "defending" President Obama against this man referring to him as a "terrorist." I am not buying it and neither should anyone else.

This was a cultural attack by O'Reilly that allowed him to fake a defense of Obama. In a way, it's kind of brilliant on the right-wing host's part.

Source: Color Lines

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Bill O'Reilly, Barack Obama And Racial Politics

This video is a case of Bill O'Reilly at his racial worst.

In this clip, we see a lot of what makes Fox News (some might call it Fox Views) a hostile network toward President Obama and to black people in general.

In this video, O'Reilly (in early campaign seeking to assist potential Republican candidates who will oppose President Obama) is at his hypocritical and racially-antagonistic worst as he hosts a segment with Amos Brown of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

O'Reilly (stoking racial fears about President Obama) was all too willing to ignore the clear double standard of the appearances of white presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton at Shiloh Baptist Church to slam President Obama for his decision to attend service at Shiloh.

Why were Reagan and Clinton not under fire for their views on the nobility of the country? What is the difference between them and President Obama?

It seems to come back to race. O'Reilly, in his utopian world turns a blind eye and deaf ear to that reality.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Mike Huckabee Proves He Really Is No Different Than A Glenn Beck When It Comes To Use Race To Incite Anti-Obama Hate

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



This is an excellent discussion on MSNBC that gets to the roots of the racially charged comments being spewed by Mike Huckabee.

This shows a darker and more sinister side to Mike Huckabee than I ever thought existed. This is incredibly disappointing. I always knew he was a far-right guy, but this is a sad turn of events that exposes him as someone who is willing to use race to stir up his far-right base.

Mike Huckabee is now clearly in the category of an Andrew Breitbart and a Glenn Beck (maybe not to that extreme, but certainly comfortable on that wing of the political spectrum).

Monday, January 31, 2011

O'Reilly Suggests President Obama Tried To Make Boehner Cry ... Aw

I must admit to being among those who are wondering what is going on with new Speaker of the House John Boehner's habitual crying.

But, I did find this passage (as quoted by The Huffington Post) a little interesting:

Bill O'Reilly expressed concern about Speaker of the House John Boehner's emotional stability on his Friday show, and said that international leaders were "laughing" at him and calling him a "sissy."

O'Reilly was speaking to Fox News colleague Chris Wallace, who will interview Boehner on Sunday. "He's got to get his emotions under control," O'Reilly said. He posited that President Obama may have been trying to make Boehner cry during the State of the Union address. He then compared him to two American icons.

"You've got your George Pattons, you've got your George Washingtons--stoic, tough," O'Reilly said. "A lot of Americans, you know, well if the guy's crying every two minutes, does that mean he's strong, does that impact on his credibility?"

So, O'Reilly thinks the president was attempting to make Boehner cry?

If President Obama can make John Boehner do anything then crying is the least of the things he should be trying to make him do.

Although it does remind me of...

"... these aren't the droids you're looking for."


Friday, December 24, 2010

Help Turn Of Fox News

Dear Sandy,

In the coming days, many of us will be spending time with family and close friends. You might find yourself in a house with Fox News on the TV, or you might find yourself in the company of a family member who likes to talk about the "truth" coming from Fox. You could also be with folks who understand the damage Fox does, but haven’t heard about this campaign. Any of these could be a great opportunity to talk about why you don’t watch Fox and why you’re part of the movement to get it turned off in public places. And if you have any good conversations, let us know.

There's no need to be confrontational. The person you’re talking with may not be receptive to what you have to say — and that’s ok. But you might be surprised. This is about sharing your concerns and beliefs, and hearing the thoughts of someone you love. When people are approached respectfully by someone they like and trust, it creates space for them to think and change.

Here are some pointers:

  1. Remain calm. The point here isn't to start an argument — it's to share information. Even though some people may be hostile to what you have to say, keeping your cool can help defuse tense situations and make even skeptics receptive to what you have to say.

  2. Just the facts. We’re often tempted to use inflammatory language when describing Fox News and their tactics — "evil" or "racist," for example. But think of the impact that this language might have on someone you’re trying to win over to your point of view. Does the fact that they watch Fox News make them "evil" or "racist"? Better to stick to the facts by describing what Fox News Channel does — stoking racial fear, helping to spread dangerous conspiracy theories, and distorting the truth. You can refer to our flyer "The Case Against Fox" for a few examples of what Fox News does, and the impact of their actions.

  3. Listen to what others have to say. If you want to be listened to, then you should also be willing to listen to others' perspectives. If they state something untrue, you can and should offer facts to correct the record when you can — but not until after they've finished their thought. And remember, the point isn’t to get into an argument or even prove that you're correct. It's to share your point of view.

  4. Offer more information. If the folks you talk to are interested in learning more about our campaign, just have them check out TurnOffFox.org. They can sign up for the campaign at that website.

The holiday season provides a unique opportunity to help more people understand what Fox is, how it poisons national discourse, and what role everyday people can play in stopping the damage.

After you have these conversations (even with those who already understand the issue), we would love to hear how they went.

Thanks and Happy Holidays!

-- James, Gabriel, William, Dani, Natasha, and the rest of the TurnOffFox.org team
December 22nd, 2010

Help support our work. ColorOfChange.org is powered by YOU — your energy and dollars. We take no money from lobbyists or large corporations that don't share our values, and our tiny staff ensures your contributions go a long way. You can contribute here:

https://secure.colorofchange.org/contribute/

Saturday, December 18, 2010

When Fox News Wins Democracy Loses ... A Message From Media Matters For America

Dear Sandy,

Glenn Beck and Fox News have had a toxic effect on the political process, and they're only going to push harder now.

Over the past two years, Fox has gone from a conservative-leaning news source to an active player in politics -- and things have taken an even darker turn as Beck's nightly show on Fox has brought right-wing extremism into the mainstream. Beck routinely launches outlandish attacks painting his progressive targets as part of a sinister conspiracy to intentionally destroy the country.

When advertisers sponsor Fox News, they're not just buying commercial airtime. They're making an affirmative investment in a political game -- one that puts dishonest smears, fearmongering, and vicious attacks ahead of accuracy. Money that goes to Fox funds Beck's conspiracy theories, baseless political attacks, and outright promotion of right-wing candidates for office.

Companies that are considering advertising on Fox need to keep that in mind, and they need to hear from you.

Give your tax-deductible donation today to help us fight Fox, Beck and conservative misinformation.

Every day, we at Media Matters for America monitor Fox News and its allies in the conservative media, researching claims, exposing violent rhetoric, debunking misinformation and preventing falsehoods from spreading unchallenged.

We've had success in making sure others in the press know that Fox is a player in politics, not an observer. We need your help to keep up that fight and get the message out to potential Fox advertisers. Unless it hits them right in the bottom line, Fox News has made it clear it won't rein in Beck and other serial misinformers.

You can be part of that fight.

Give your tax-deductible donation today to help us fight Fox, Beck and conservative misinformation.

Thank you for your support.

David Brock
Founder and CEO
Media Matters for America

Thursday, December 16, 2010

While Repeatedly Showing Shooting Video Clip, O'Reilly Asks Is It Appropriate To Show



Right-wing Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly does and says stuff that makes you shake your head in utter disbelief.

OK, while warning his viewers about the real violence in a video clip of a shooting scene in Florida during a school board meeting, O'Reilly repeatedly plays (teases) the footage.

Also, while repeatedly showing the footage of gunman Clay Duke's shooting rampage to his viewers, O'Reilly asks if the footage should be shown.

WTF?

Thursday, December 2, 2010

The O'Reilly Sucks Blog Highlights Bill O'Reilly Going Ape S--t Over A Cartoon

I am always amazed at how Bill O'Reilly obsesses about almost every slight (real or perceived) against his precious Fox News.

O'Reilly is like the parent of a serial killer, who says "he/she was such a good kid." Like that parent, O'Reilly will go to great lengths to take up for Fox News no matter how inaccurate, racist or biased.

These days, O'Reilly has been whining about some shots the hit Fox Broadcasting cartoon "The Simpsons" has been taking at Fox News (see the cartoons below from Steve of The O'Reilly Sucks Blog that I found).

Below is what Steve had:



But of course O'Reilly did not find it funny at all. The Fox News blowhard came to the defense of his network, labeling the cartoon characters as pinheads.
O'REILLY: Continuing to bite the hand that feeds part of it, Fox Broadcasting once again allows its cartoon characters to run wild.

VIDEO from The Simpsons featuring helicopter emblazoned with "Not Racist But #1 With Racists" slogan. As the helicopter lets one passenger off at the statue of liberty, it becomes unsteady and the pilot says, "We're unbalanced. Its not fair" before crashing.

Pinheads? I believe so.
Even though O'Reilly slammed them, the Simpsons was right back to needling Fox News on last Sunday's show in which the right-wing network was given yet another alternative slogan, this one reading "Unsuitable For Viewers Under 75."



Fox Broadcasting and the producers of the Simpsons are not living in fear of Papa Bear Bill O'Reilly.

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Bill O'Reilly Goes On The Attack Against Detroit Free Press Cartoonist

Here is Mike Thompson's Detroit Free Press cartoon that apparently caused Bill O'Reilly to blow a nut.


Fox News
far-right (I know ... kind of redundant) commentator Bill O'Reilly has been working overtime to take revenge on numerous people who have dared to in any way be what he perceives as negative toward Juan Williams, who made bigoted comments about his fear of Muslims on airplanes.

One of the targets of O'Reilly has been Detroit Free Press cartoonist and blogger Mike Thompson, who apparently drew a cartoon that drew the ire of Big Daddy Bill.

I found the response of Thompson, and a portion of it is published here:
For the past week, Fox News commentator Bill O’Reilly and his colleagues at Fox News have been bending over backwards to defend former National Public Radio news analyst and current Fox commentator Juan Wiliams, who was fired from his NPR gig for making disparaging remarks about Muslims. A journalist should not be fired for speaking his mind, according to O’Reilly. No, apparently a journalist who speaks his mind should have his e-mail inbox crammed with threatening, disparaging e-mails, according to O’Reilly.

Last Sunday I drew a cartoon about Fox News and the Juan Wiliams affair. O’Reilly apparently took offense to my cartoon and showed it on the air Monday evening. He then gave out my work e-mail address and instructed his viewers to “let him know what you think.” O’Reilly stressed that his viewers should take the high road in their e-mails to me, which is a little like placing a bowl of Halloween candy in front of kids and telling them not to gorge themselves. O’Reilly’s smart enough to know what would happen.

And e-mail me they did, more than 2,500 e-mails, many of them unsuitable to publish here, clogged my inbox.
O'Reilly is not above name calling (does the word "pinhead" ring a bell?), badmouthing people (ask Boyce Watkins, the family of the murdered Dr. George Tiller and others), using blatant acts of intimidation (not unlike what gangs do), dispatching his hired thugs (disguised as "producers") to harass and badger his enemies and more. He has not resorted (yet) to the methods of U.S. senate candidate Rand Paul supporters through which he would have people beat down and stomp on critics.

Ah yes, tough guy Bill O'Reilly now is going after cartoonists.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Morris Admits He Is Working For The GOP Through Fox News

Here is Dick Morris, a Fox News analyst, admitting what we already knew: He is working for the GOP and doing it for the love of the party and probably for the hatred of President Obama.

From the October 20 edition of Fox News Channel's The O'Reilly Factor:

Friday, September 24, 2010

Hat Tip To Crooks And Liars For Showing What Bill O'Reilly Didn't From His Interview With Jon Stewart

Crooks and Liars has put together a nice video to show some of what conservative Fox News host Bill O'Reilly didn't show on his right-wing television program as he interviewed Comedy Central's Jon Stewart.



Stewart kind of whips O'Reilly good in several of these clips. It's not surprising that O'Reilly aired mostly what was favorable to him.

Good work by David Neiwert.

Crooks and Liars:
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/what-bill-oreilly-edited-out-his-int

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Media Matters For America Asks: Does Fox News Have A Race Problem?

It is a legitimate question that Media Matters for America poses.



The beat goes on at Fox News. The network uses race to divide Americans and then accuses black people of playing the so-called race card.

Friday, May 28, 2010

Tough Guy Glenn Beck Makes Fun Of Malia Obama, Questions Her Intelligence

Fox News extremist and radio talk show nut Glenn Beck is on the attack and this time his victim is Malia Obama, the 11-year-old daughter of President Obama and Michelle Obama.

What a tough guy Glenn Beck is these days. This is a man with a dark heart who has a serious, serious problem.

What kind of loser of a human being makes fun of an 11-year-old concerned about stopping the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico?

Once again, it shows the dark soul behind the shows that Beck puts on whether he is on Fox News or he is on the radio.

BECK: This is such a ridiculous — this is such a ridiculous thing that his daughter– (imitating Malia) Daddy?

GRAY: It’s so stupid.

BECK: How old is his daughter? Like, thirteen?

GRAY: Well, one of thems, I think, thirteen, one’s eleven, or something.

BECK: “Did you plug the hole yet, daddy?” Is that’s their — that’s the level of their education, that they’re coming to — they’re coming to daddy and saying ‘Daddy, did you plug the hole yet?’ ” Plug the hole!

This man is a coward who has no character and seems almost less than human.

I wonder when Bill O'Reilly, Michelle Malkin, Sean Hannity and others will speak out against Glenn Beck and condemn him the way he and so many others did David Letterman for cracking jokes about the Palin girls.

Don't expect a whole lot from hypocritical bigots like O'Reilly, Dennis Miller, Hannity and others.

I can hardly wait to see and hear how Beck turns himself into the victim.

UPDATE: Beck has issued sort of an apology that is posted on his Web site:
In discussing how President Obama uses children to shield himself from criticism, I broke my own rule about leaving kids out of political debates. The children of public figures should be left on the sidelines. It was a stupid mistake and I apologize--and as a dad I should have known better.
Weak.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

A Letter From Media Matters For America Regarding Stossel's Hostility To Civil Rights Act

Dear Sandy,

For the second time in less than a week, Fox News' John Stossel has used his platform at Fox to stick up for "the right to discriminate."

Tuesday night on The O'Reilly Factor, Stossel continued to call for the repeal of a portion of the Civil Rights Act -- the section that protects people from racial discrimination in public accommodations and businesses.

That's right: Instead of apologizing for his inflammatory comments about the Civil Rights Act, Stossel doubled down, praising his own "consistency" on a "complicated" issue.

The truth is, it's not that complicated. Fox should fire John Stossel instead of continuing to give him a megaphone for his out-of-touch views. We at Media Matters for America are joining with Color of Change to send this message to Fox and News Corp.

Tell Fox News: John Stossel has to go.

"Private businesses ought to get to discriminate," Stossel told Fox host Megyn Kelly last week. He also claimed -- against the evidence of history -- that we should wait for "free-market competition" to take care of racial discrimination. Stossel is sticking up for the rights of those practicing racial discrimination, not those who have been discriminated against.

Tell Fox News: John Stossel has to go.

Civil rights activists fought hard and braved real danger to end segregation and pass the Civil Rights Act, and the fight for equal justice and civil rights continues today. By promoting abhorrent comments like Stossel's, Fox disrespects that struggle.

What's more, Stossel's comments show ignorance not just of history, but of the ongoing challenge of racial discrimination. Stossel's opposition to this key civil rights protection would take us back to a time when restaurants, movie theaters and swimming pools could pick and choose who they let in based on race. He'd protect the right of racists to actively discriminate, and oppose basic rules to ensure fairness for everyone.

Fox has a troubling history of racially-charged statements by hosts and guests. Now, Stossel has made it clear where he stands -- but where does Fox stand? Does it support its employee's comments about the "right to discriminate" and his insistence on rolling back a critical portion of the historic Civil Rights Act?

As a Fox contributor, Stossel represents the network, and Fox bears responsibility for what it airs. By airing Stossel's repugnant comments, Fox legitimizes his indefensible position and treats it as a valid point of view. That's a disservice to those who still consider Fox a legitimate news outlet.

Thousands have already spoken out against Stossel's comments, but he isn't getting the message. Please join us in holding Fox and News Corp accountable. They shouldn't provide a platform for Stossel to promote the right to discriminate. Tell them to fire John Stossel.

Tell Fox News: John Stossel has to go.

Thank you for your support.

Eric Burns
Media Matters for America

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

What Does A Cocaine Dealer Look Like To Bill O'Reilly ... Marc Lamont Hill, Apparently

It was a rare time that I watched a broadcast of The O'Reilly Factor, and this caught my attention even though I was not sure I heard what I thought I heard.

What was Bill O'Reilly trying to say when he jokingly said to Marc Lamont Hill (pictured), "Say you're a cocaine dealer - and you kind of look like one a little bit ..."?

It was an awkward exchange. Hill replied with a joke about O'Reilly to try and lighten it up, but I sensed some tension at that very moment. Clearly, O'Reilly put Hill in a tough position with what could be construed as an offensive remark. Hill, it seemed, let O'Reilly off the hook at that moment.

Question for Bill O'Reilly: What does a cocaine dealer look like that would make you ask that question of Hill?

Media Matters for America:
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201005260073

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Join FAIR In Calling Out Bill O'Reilly For His Anti-Immigration Fearmongering

Source: FAIR

Fox host Bill O'Reilly has repeatedly defended Arizona's draconian new immigration law by pointing to the state's exploding crime rate. But there is no documented crime wave in Arizona, and immigrants have generally been found to commit fewer crimes than native-born citizens. Please join me in calling on O'Reilly to retract his falsehoods--sign FAIR's petition today:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/592/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=3806

ACTION ALERT:
Stop O'Reilly's Immigrant Crime Slurs
Blaming immigrants for nonexistent Arizona crime wave

Fox New Channel host Bill O'Reilly has repeatedly singled out one reason to support Arizona's draconian new immigration law: the state's exploding crime rate. But there is no documented crime wave in Arizona, and O'Reilly's attempt to link immigrants to crime is equally unfounded.

O'Reilly's record of overheated rhetoric is clear:
May 3:
"Arizona had to do something. In the capital city, Phoenix, crime's out of control. For example, last year, New York City, with six times as many residents as Phoenix, had just 16,000 more reported crimes."

May 4:
"The Arizona authorities say we're desperate. We don't have the money. Our crime problem is through the roof. Phoenix one of the most dangerous cities in the country. We got to do something."

May 6:
"So the state of Arizona faced with an overwhelming crime problem, social chaos and a bankrupt treasury had to do something."

May 13:
"Arizona's bankrupt. The crime's through the roof. Phoenix is the kidnapping capital of the United States now."

May 14
"Arizona's already won the war of public opinion.... Americans understand, look, here's a state where the federal government will not do its job. The state has 500,000 illegal aliens. It's bankrupt. Phoenix is the kidnapping capital of the United States. Crime is through the roof. Drugs are coming across the border all the time. So what do you expect Arizona to do?"
In reality, there is no rising crime rate in Arizona (AP, 5/10/10; CNN, 4/29/10). The same is true of Phoenix--despite the oft-repeated (and thinly sourced) description of the city as a kidnapping haven. The city of Phoenix reported that crime in 2009 was at its lowest rate in 15 years, and violent crime had dropped 18 percent from 2008. Mayor Phil Gordon told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (4/20/09) that "crime is actually down, in every category."

What's more, there is no evidence linking immigrants (documented or undocumented) to increases in crime, in Arizona or anywhere else. In fact, much of the research indicates the opposite--that immigrants commit crime at a lower rate than the population at large (Immigration Policy Center, 4/28/10).

As for the state being "bankrupt," Arizona does face budget shortfalls--along with some 46 other states (CBPP, 2/25/10).

Thanks to people like Bill O'Reilly, laws like Arizona's SB 1070 are discussed in a media environment of fear-mongering and bigotry.

Stand up and demand that O'Reilly show his evidence--or retract his slurs.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/592/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=3806

***
FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986.

www.fair.org