Showing posts with label death. Show all posts
Showing posts with label death. Show all posts

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Politics Can Be Brutal

Antonin Scalia
Saturday night, I heard about the death of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Immediately, a thought came to my mind: How soon would it be before the sides started to jockey for political positioning.

Well, it did not take long. The death of Justice Scalia has major stakes, politically speaking. While the sides balance sympathy for the Scalia family, it was all too inevitable that the sides (liberal and conservative, alike) would begin to battle.

But, honestly, the idea that replacing Justice Scalia should wait until there's a new president, nearly 11 months from now, is ridiculous. Join us in reality, here.

Honestly, though, people need to straight-up chill. The man just passed away and both sides are already fighting about a replacement that has not even be announced. But, in this day of hyper partisanship, should we really be all that surprised?

I was not and am not surprised.

No one should be surprised.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Disgusting Facebook Group Speaks Volumes Of The Level Of Hate In This Country

It's rare for me that I "defriend" people on Facebook or get overly upset at what some people do as far as joining groups or liking groups on the social networking site.

For the most part, I recognize that some people are liberal, some moderate and some conservative. In fact, I took a Facebook poll once upon a time that indicated that my friends were almost evenly divided (slightly more liberal) between liberal and conservative. That mostly even split was not necessarily a huge surprise to me.

I recognize that my conservative brothers and sisters typically do not like President Obama (and some hate him ... some hated and disliked him when he was still running against Hillary Clinton in the primary). That's fine. Some people oppose the health care legislation. OK. That is part of politics. Such disagreement is reasonable ... even all the scare-tactic garbage about death panels and pulling the plug on grandma are part of political discourse these days (I reserve the right to change my mind later).

But, some things are disgusting and go well beyond civil politics (and even uncivil politics). One day, as I was looking through one of these feeds that Facebook runs highlighting activities of my friends, I noticed that a number of them had joined a group: "VOTE FOR OBAMA: BECAUSE SOCIALISM WORKED SO WELL IN USSR."

Obviously, I see that as stupid, but whatever.

Here is what made my jaw drop (a statement posted on the group's page ... perhaps symbolic of the group's core values:

DEAR LORD, THIS YEAR YOU TOOK MY FAVORITE ACTOR, PATRICK SWAYZIE. YOU TOOK MY FAVORITE ACTRESS, FARAH FAWCETT. YOU TOOK MY FAVORITE SINGER, MICHAEL JACKSON. I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW, MY FAVORITE PRESIDENT IS BARACK OBAMA. AMEN

It's a poor attempt at humor that is disgusting and perhaps is indicative of why death threats against this president are up exponentially.

As of April 29, the group was up to 1,172, 331.

What it means reminds me of what a friend I had years ago used to say (excuse the language), "There are a lot of sick fucks in this world."

I could not agree more.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Surprised To See Jesse Jackson And Al Sharpton Turn Up After Michael Jackson’s Death?

I will not even pretend to say I was surprised to see the Rev. Al Sharpton show up on television to be interviewed after the shockingly-sudden death of Michael Jackson, who was one of the great entertainers of all time. In the back of my mind, I was wondering when Rev. Sharpton would make his first appearance on the airwaves to have something to say about the life and death of Michael Jackson. But, then I began to wonder, when would the Rev. Jesse Jackson show up? It was not long before Rev. Jackson had shown up to essentially serve as spokesperson for the family of Michael Jackson. I could see the photograph that accompanied the Associated Press story with Rev. Jackson standing with Joe Jackson, father off Michael Jackson (that’s a lot of Jacksons).

I know a lot of people will come out and criticize Rev. Jackson and Rev. Sharpton (both men certainly have earned their share of legitimate criticism over the years). I was hardly surprised Rev. Sharpton quickly found a television camera. But, perhaps Rev. Jackson might have been sought by the Jackson family or had offered to serve as a spokesperson for the Jackson family. To some extent, how his role came about as a sort of spokesperson for the Jackson family is a bit unclear to me.

While I know Rev. Jackson and Rev. Sharpton both crave the spotlight (we’ve seen evidence of that over and over again), personally, I am going to give Jesse a pass on this one. I think, at least in this case, it appears Rev. Jackson is doing a noble deed for the family of Michael Jackson (even if he does get something out of it for himself: the spotlight he seems to enjoy).

If Jesse is able to bring the family of Michael Jackson a little comfort and support during this tragedy then I have no problem with it.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Madonna, Others React To Death Of Michael Jackson

MADONNA: "I can't stop crying over the sad news. I have always admired Michael Jackson. The world has lost one of the greats, but his music will live on forever! My heart goes out to his three children and other members of his family. God bless."

LISA MARIE PRESLEY: "I am so very sad and confused with every emotion possible. I am heartbroken for his children, who I know were everything to him, and for his family. This is such a massive loss on so many levels, words fail me."

CHER (on CNN): "I am having a million reactions," said Cher. "When I think of him, I think of this young boy, this teenager I first met … He was a great teenager, optimistic and adorable." She also praised his talent. "He was a great singer. You can't write him off as just a pop [star]. He was a genius like Ray Charles … He had a gift… He was able to connect with people."

WHITNEY HOUSTON: "I am full of grief."

USHER: was "deeply saddened" by the loss and paid tribute to Jackson's legacy. "May God cover you Michael. We all lift your name up in prayer. I pray for the entire Jackson family particularly Michael's mother, children and all his fans that loved him so much. I would not be the artist, performer, and philanthropist I am today without the influence of Michael. I have great admiration and respect for him and I'm so thankful I had the opportunity to meet and perform with such a great entertainer, who in so many ways, transcended the culture. He broke barriers, he changed radio formats! With music, he made it possible for people like Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama to impact the mainstream world. His legacy is unparalleled Michael Jackson will never be forgotten."

People Magazine:
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20287803,00.html

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Bill O'Reilly Tries To Justify His Hate Speech

Conservative Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly is on Townhall.com trying to justify to readers his hateful speech that helped create a hostile atmosphere surrounding the late Dr. George Tiller. Over and over again, O'Reilly repeated the line "Tiller the baby killer" as he attacked (repeatedly) Dr. Tiller, a man who bravely provided legal abortions to girls and women. Repeating that line is designed to reinforce in listeners and viewers how dangerous O'Reilly truly believed Dr. Tiller was. Read O'Reilly's entry (as much as you can stomach) on Townhall.com and see how he fakes outrage in the beginning of the blog before he spends the rest of it building a case of hate against Dr. George Tiller. It's a hit piece against a dead man. It's a reprehensible blog by O'Reilly who fakes feeling pained by Dr. Tiller's death, builds a case against the dead man and then takes another opportunity to attack liberals.

Townhall.com:
http://townhall.com/columnists/BillOReilly/2009/06/03/the_killing_of_george_tiller

Right-Winger Ken Blackwell Again Proves To Be Misguided

Right-wing commentator Ken Blackwell has made some strong comments once again attacking President Barack Obama. Now, Blackwell is entitled to his opinion, but his opinion is a misguided attempt to take a shot at President Obama through the exploitation of Pvt. William Long's brutal murder by a low-life thug (Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad) who attacked innocent individuals and viciously murdered a young man. It's a reprehensible act and the perpetrator must be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

Blackwell, like so many fellow conservatives, has sought to exploit the murder of Pvt. Long to attack President Obama. It's beyond disgusting.

Wrote Blackwell:

The contrast between President Obama’s reaction to the murder of a late-term abortionist and the murder of a U.S. Army Recruiter could not be more stark. Obama raced to send U.S. Marshals into abortion facilities. He denounced the murder in the strongest terms in a statement which is posted on the White House website:

I am shocked and outraged by the murder of Dr. George Tiller as he attended church services this morning. However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.

I agree that we cannot resolve our differences by acts of violence. I would like to have seen such a strong statement from the Obama administration when two U.S. Army Recruiters were shot in Arkansas, one of them fatally, by a recent convert to Islam.

Obama’s reaction to this heinous act of violence in Little Rock was, to be charitable, muted. He was busily preparing to fly off to Saudi Arabia to continue his apology tour.

President Obama could not have won in this case. Had he swooped in he would have been accused of exploiting Pvt. Long's death for good publicity. By choosing to be far more private in expressing his condolences, he has been attacked by conservative Republicans hungry for any excuse to attack him. By the way, do you want evidence this was a partisan hit piece by Blackwell? Take a look at his last sentence in this excerpt. It's an attack using tired and old Republican talking points designed to portray the president as some kind of hater of America.

Notice also how Blackwell makes sure to mention the man was a recent convert of Islam. That was not mentioned by accident.

Let us go back to one thing Blackwell said in the above excerpt:
The contrast between President Obama’s reaction to the murder of a late-term abortionist and the murder of a U.S. Army Recruiter could not be more stark. Obama raced to send U.S. Marshals into abortion facilities.

As heinous and senseless as the murder of Pvt. Long was, we have to understand the differences in the two situations. Dr. George Tiller (Scott Roeder is the man being detained for this wicked act that took a life), a man who has provided abortions to women in need, was viciously assassinated in a church. This nation has a history of domestic terrorism in regard to abortion clinics and toward abortion doctors. Doctors are not soldiers and are not as specially trained and armed to protect themselves. Also, any disturbed fool crazy enough to murder a doctor or bomb a clinic is a danger to many other private citizens seeking a legal medical procedure. When clinics are bombed, not only are innocent civilian doctors in danger, but so too are women, men, girls and boys who could find themselves in harm's way because of some domestic terrorist seeking to deny a woman's right to choose by what an individual feels are any means necessary.

It's a shame that Blackwell is exploiting the death of Pvt. William Long to try and score cheap and partisan political points against President Obama.

Sadly, however, Ken Blackwell is not alone.

Townhall.com:
http://townhall.com/Columnists/KenBlackwell/2009/06/04/arm_our_military_recruiters

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Hate Speech On Fox Forum?

Here is some hate speech from The Fox Forum. I wonder if Bill O’Reilly will be policing this hate the way he polices the user-generated comments left on so-called liberal blog sites. I’m sure O’Reilly, being fair and balanced as he claims to be, will condemn these remarks in the strongest possible terms. I mean, if he is consistent, he will attack The Fox Nation and The Fox Forum the way he attacks Think Progress, The Huffington Post and The Daily Kos. That is what someone who is objective would do, isn’t it? Of course, since O’Reilly is neither fair nor balanced, none of us should expect any outrage from America’s Daddy over these hateful comments (including one hoping for the death of our president). These hateful comments are in regard to a “Don’t Speak: What We Don’t Want to Hear in Obama’s Muslim Speech” blog posted by Judith Miller. I don’t agree with everything Miller said, most notably the tired implication that President Obama is going on an apology tour (a conservative/Republican talking point).

54 Responses to ““Don’t Speak: What We Don’t Want to Hear in Obama’s Muslim Speech””

  1. Truly says:

    Ms. Miller. Well put. For your thoughtful piece, whoever writes HIS speeches should shortcut to your itemized points.

    Flag this comment

    Reply
  2. Michael in Atlanta says:

    johnnyboy says:
    June 3, 2009 at 10:01 am
    He could fairly point out that there is as much extremism in America as in their parts of the world. One only needs to read the bile on these pages to see that.
    ###########

    I agree. There are extremist on both sides of the debate and both need to be ignored. If the the extremist get their way, Bin Laden will get his wish for a Chris.tain vs Is.lam holy war.

    Flag this comment

    Reply
  3. JULES says:

    WHAT LANGUAGE WILL HE TALK IN ENGLISH OR ISLAM?

    Flag this comment

    Reply
  4. bin laden even hates obama… wow

    Flag this comment

    Reply
  5. JULES says:

    MAYBE WE WILL GET LUCKY AND BIN LADEN WILL TAKE OBAMA OUT WHILE HE IS OVERSEAS.

    Flag this comment

    Reply

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Greg Gutfield Remains A Proponent Of Torture

Fox News’ television show host Greg Gutfield is one of a large number of people to the right of the political mainstream who favor torture. You see, they don’t call it torture, because torture sounds too evil. So, they’ve made up this less nasty-sounding way of saying it. They call it “enhanced interrogation.” I suppose that sends the Greg Gutfields and the Sean Hannitys of the world to sleep with a smile knowing that we are involved in “enhanced interrogation” and not torture. Sure, “enhanced interrogation” doesn’t sound quite as immoral as torture.

Consider this excerpt from Gutfield’s column:

Lets get this straight: implementing enhanced interrogation techniques is not immoral. What’s immoral is not doing everything possible to prevent an enemy from killing the people you love.That one rule overrules everything – making the actions you take toward that enemy supremely moral – whether the acts involve waterboarding, sleep deprivation, playing loud music, or watching David Shuster.

First Gutfield tries to sugarcoat torture and then he goes to the conservative scare tactic of trying to make it seem as though anyone opposed to torture is essentially cheer leading and enabling our enemies.

More from GutlessGutfield:

The idea that waterboarding is evil really stems from certain folks feeling awkward when asked about it at Brentwood cocktail parties. And that’s the truly immoral element in this ridiculous debate: if saving face means more than saving lives, then we’re totally screwed.I’d rather live in a country that’s despised for waterboarding two asshats, than a well-liked one with craters for cities. The desire for popularity is really at the heart of this: and it’s a far worse moral crime than anything done with a rag and bucket of water.

This depth and breadth of stupidity in the above excerpt is staggering. The Greg Gutfields of the world seem to think it’s difficult (if not impossible) to achieve peace unless torture, excuse me, “enhanced interrogation” is involved. He pushes the idiotic argument that either you torture people or you live in a country with “craters for cities.” This is an old-fashioned Republican scare tactic.

This is not a desire for popularity. Now, it suits people like Greg Gutfield well to portray it in such a fashion. We do not need to be the most popular nation, but we do need to be a nation that is respected by our neighbors around the world (something that was not the case during the administration of President George W. Bush). We need to build bridges and not destroy bridges. I wonder how Greg Gutfield would feel about people torturing our people to keep their cities from becoming craters or to be able to get more information?

We must be a nation that shows people we are the best and not be a nation that flies around the world telling everyone we’re the best and trying to initimidate our enemies and all who have differences with us. To the Greg Gutfields of the world, I say “give diplomacy and peace a chance.” I don’t expect anything other than the politics of fear and intimidation from those on the far right of the political spectrum.

Big Hollywood:
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2009/05/15/daily-gut-saving-face-vs-saving-lives/